NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
VS
Apollo Lake GT1.5
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
VS
Apollo Lake GT1.5

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M  vs  Apollo Lake GT1.5.

1025
Place in performance rating
not rated
GT2xx
Architecture
Generation 9.0
15 June 2009 (12 years ago)
Release date
no data
$129
Price now
no data
0.01
Value for money
no data
N10P-GS
GPU code name
Apollo Lake GT1.5
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M  vs  Apollo Lake GT1.5 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

550 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
8.800
Texture fill rate
no data
116.16 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
48
CUDA cores
no data
174
Gigaflops
no data
48
Pipelines / CUDA cores
144
486 million
Number of transistors
no data
23 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M and Apollo Lake GT1.5 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
no data
medium sized
Laptop size
no data
PCI-E 2.0
Bus support
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M vs Apollo Lake GT1.5.

DDR3, GDDR2, GDDR3
Memory type
no data
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
25.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M vs Apollo Lake GT1.5.

Single Link DVIDisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMIVGA
Display Connectors
no data
+
Multi monitor support
no data
2048x1536
Maximum VGA resolution
no data
+
HDMI
no data

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

+
CUDA
no data
8.0
Power management
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M and Apollo Lake GT1.5 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
1.1
OpenCL
3.0

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M and Apollo Lake GT1.5 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M or Apollo Lake GT1.5 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
Apollo Lake GT1.5
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
Apollo Lake GT1.5
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
Apollo Lake GT1.5
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
Apollo Lake GT1.5
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
Apollo Lake GT1.5
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M

1.78% faster in synthetic tests

Advantages of Apollo Lake GT1.5

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 40 nm)

So, NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M or Apollo Lake GT1.5?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M .

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M versus Apollo Lake GT1.5 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.6 Out of 25 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score