NVIDIA GeForce 920A
VS
AMD Radeon R7 M365X
NVIDIA GeForce 920A
VS
AMD Radeon R7 M365X

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA GeForce 920A  vs  AMD Radeon R7 M365X.

691
Place in performance rating
683
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GK208B
Code name
Litho
Desktop
Type
Desktop
13 March 2015 (6 years ago)
Release date
5 May 2015 (6 years ago)
$187
Price now
no data
1.49
Value for money
no data
GK208B
GPU code name
Litho
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA GeForce 920A  vs  AMD Radeon R7 M365X in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

384
Pipelines
384
954 MHz
Core clock speed
900 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
825 MHz
915 million
Transistor count
690 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
33 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
30.53
Texture fill rate
23.04
441.6 gflops
Floating-point performance
737.3 gflops
no data
Compute units
6
384
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
no data
Boost clock speed
825 MHz
915 million
Number of transistors
690 million
33 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce 920A and AMD Radeon R7 M365X come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x8
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce 920A vs AMD Radeon R7 M365X.

DDR3
Memory type
GDDR5
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
2002 MHz
Memory clock speed
1000 MHz
16.02 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA GeForce 920A vs AMD Radeon R7 M365X.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
Eyefinity
1

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
AppAcceleration
-
no data
FreeSync
1
no data
HD3D
+
no data
PowerTune
+
no data
TrueAudio
-
no data
ZeroCore
+
no data
Enduro
-
no data
DualGraphics
1
no data
Switchable graphics
1

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA GeForce 920A and AMD Radeon R7 M365X is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
DirectX® 12
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
Not Listed
no data
Mantle
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce 920A and AMD Radeon R7 M365X graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce 920A or AMD Radeon R7 M365X good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 920A
AMD Radeon R7 M365X
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 920A
AMD Radeon R7 M365X
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 920A
AMD Radeon R7 M365X
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 920A
AMD Radeon R7 M365X
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 920A
AMD Radeon R7 M365X
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 920A

0.09% faster in synthetic tests

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 M365X

More maximum RAM amount (4 GB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (64 GB/s vs 16.02 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce 920A or AMD Radeon R7 M365X?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce 920A .

NVIDIA GeForce 920A versus AMD Radeon R7 M365X performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.8 Out of 4 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score