Intel UHD Graphics 630
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
VS

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Intel UHD Graphics 630  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GT 730.

516
Place in performance rating
647
no data
Value for money (0-100)
13.08
Generation 9.5
Architecture
Fermi
Comet Lake GT2
Code name
GF108
Desktop
Type
Desktop
1 October 2017
Release date
18 June 2014
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$59.99
no data
Price now
$72

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Intel UHD Graphics 630  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

184
Pipelines
96
300 MHz
Core clock speed
700 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
189 million
Transistor count
585 million
14 nm+++
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
15 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
49 Watt
26.45
Texture fill rate
11.2 GT/s
460.8 gflops
Floating-point performance
268.8 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how video cards Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x1
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
145 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730.

System Shared
Memory type
DDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
25.6 GB/s
+
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two video cards. What's the difference between Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA и AMD are using different technologies.

+
Quick Sync
no data

API support

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 video cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel UHD Graphics 630 or NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Death Stranding (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
F1 2020 (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 630 38.1 13.2 7.5 5.4
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 630

1.81% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (184 vs 96)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm+++ vs 40 nm)

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 49 Watt)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730

There is no accountable advantage

So, Intel UHD Graphics 630 or NVIDIA GeForce GT 730?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel UHD Graphics 630 .

Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Multi-platform Ice Storm test shows the videocard performance by using the off-screen rendering method. Standard testing conditions are 1280*720 (720p).

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Unlike Ice Storm, Cloud Gate test elaborated by 3DMark employs more resource-intensive scenes. The better the final estimation, the faster your videocard is. The processing is carried out by means of DirectX 10.

3DMark Fire Strike Score

This is an advanced videocard benchmark. With DirectX 11 being used for conducting the processing, the normal testing time is 15 minutes. The higher the estimation, the faster the videocard is.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Complex graphic scenes require all the videocard’s resources. They use the entire RAM and computing power. The test’s results can be viewed below.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

This benchmark analyzes the videocard’s game power with the use of Direct X 11 (multi-threading, tessellation, shader computations).

3DMark Vantage Performance

This Direct X10-based benchmark contains AI tests, physics, and 6 computing tests.

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

This is the world-famous benchmark for determining the videocard performance in apps. The testing employs graphic models and real program scenes.

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This test works for all types of videocards, has an innovative cross-platform core, and supports Direct X 9/10/11 and OpenGL.

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Siemens NX (snx-02) is a dedicated SPECviewperf 12 set for graphic load tracing. It includes numerous rendering modes.

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

This test has been elaborated on the basis of Autodesk Showcase 2013. It features shading and shade projection modes.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This test provides the best estimation of graphic processor performance. It procures highly accurate results.

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

This is a special benchmarking set designed as a 3D rendering app. It employs all the videocard’s resources.

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

Maya-04 set elaborated by SPECviewperf 12 contains numerous rendering modes including filling, smoothing, and transparency.

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

This is a pre-installed SPECviewperf 12 set called Energy-01 that serves for determining the videocard’s power. It carries out volumetric rendering.

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

This benchmark offers videocard power testing in various rendering modes (smoothing, reflection filling, and edge filling).

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

This videocard power and speed test features the rendering of a plane and a car’s models. The better the estimation, the more powerful your videocard is.

Passmark

PassMark is a great benchmark that gets updated regularly and shows relevant information on the videocard’s performance.

User rating

3.5 Out of 210 Hitesti Score
2.8 Out of 243 Hitesti Score