Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VS
AMD FireStream 9250
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VS
AMD FireStream 9250

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7  vs  AMD FireStream 9250.

377
Place in performance rating
605
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Architecture
TeraScale
Tiger Lake Xe
Code name
RV770
Laptop
Type
Desktop
15 August 2020 (1 year ago)
Release date
16 June 2008 (13 years ago)
Tiger Lake Xe
GPU code name
RV770
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7  vs  AMD FireStream 9250 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

96
Pipelines
800
no data
Core clock speed
625 MHz
no data
Transistor count
956 million
10 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
25.00
no data
Floating-point performance
1,000.0 gflops
96
Pipelines / CUDA cores
800
no data
Number of transistors
956 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
150 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and AMD FireStream 9250 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 vs AMD FireStream 9250.

DDR4
Memory type
GDDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1986 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
63.55 GB/s
+
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 vs AMD FireStream 9250.

no data
Display Connectors
1x DVI

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

+
Quick Sync
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and AMD FireStream 9250 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

DirectX 12_1
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
no data
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and AMD FireStream 9250 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 or AMD FireStream 9250 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
AMD FireStream 9250
Death Stranding (2020) Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
AMD FireStream 9250
F1 2020 (2020) Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
AMD FireStream 9250
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
AMD FireStream 9250
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
AMD FireStream 9250
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

18.84% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (10 nm vs 55 nm)

Advantages of AMD FireStream 9250

More pipelines (800 vs 96)

So, Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 or AMD FireStream 9250?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 .

Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 versus AMD FireStream 9250 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score