Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100  vs  NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS.

not rated
Place in performance rating
not rated
no data
Value for money (0-100)
6.26
Gen. 4
Architecture
Tesla
no data
Code name
G86
no data
Type
Laptop
9 May 2007 (14 years ago)
Release date
9 May 2007 (14 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$14.99
$77
Price now
$17.98 (1.2x MSRP)
Crestline
GPU code name
G86M
Laptop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100  vs  NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
16
500 MHz
Core clock speed
400 MHz
no data
Transistor count
210 million
90 nm
Manufacturing process technology
80 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
11 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
3.200
no data
Floating-point performance
25.6 gflops
8
Pipelines / CUDA cores
16
no data
Number of transistors
210 million
13.5 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
11 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
MXM-I

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS.

no data
Memory type
GDDR2 / GDDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
256 MB
no data
Memory bus width
64 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
600 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
PCI-E 16x
+
no data
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting)
+
no data
PowerMizer 7.0
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

DirectX 10, Shader 3.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
no data
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 or NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS
Death Stranding (2020) Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS
F1 2020 (2020) Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS
Gears Tactics (2020) Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS
Doom Eternal (2020) Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS

1.38% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($17.98 (1.2x MSRP) vs $77)

Finer manufacturing process technology (80 nm vs 90 nm)

So, Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 or NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS .

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 versus NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS performance benchmarks comparison

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

4.0 Out of 46 Hitesti Score
4.0 Out of 5 Hitesti Score