Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
VS
AMD Radeon 540X
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
VS
AMD Radeon 540X

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150  vs  AMD Radeon 540X.

not rated
Place in performance rating
558
Gen. 4
Architecture
GCN 4.0
no data
Code name
Lexa
no data
Type
Laptop
10 January 2010 (11 years ago)
Release date
12 August 2019 (2 years ago)
no data
Price now
$421
no data
Value for money
3.25
Pineview
GPU code name
Lexa
Laptop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150  vs  AMD Radeon 540X in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
512
no data
Boost Clock
1046 MHz
no data
Transistor count
2,200 million
45 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
33.47
2
Pipelines / CUDA cores
512
200 MHz
Boost clock speed
1219 MHz
123 Million
Number of transistors
2,200 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
50 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 and AMD Radeon 540X come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 vs AMD Radeon 540X.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
64 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
112.0 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 vs AMD Radeon 540X.

no data
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
no data
HDMI
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 and AMD Radeon 540X is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0
DirectX
12 (12_0)
no data
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 and AMD Radeon 540X graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 or AMD Radeon 540X good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
AMD Radeon 540X
Death Stranding (2020) Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
AMD Radeon 540X
F1 2020 (2020) Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
AMD Radeon 540X
Gears Tactics (2020) Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
AMD Radeon 540X
Doom Eternal (2020) Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
AMD Radeon 540X 41.1
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of AMD Radeon 540X

7.27% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 45 nm)

So, Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 or AMD Radeon 540X?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon 540X .

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 versus AMD Radeon 540X performance benchmarks comparison

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

15167 (100 %)

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

2435 (100 %)

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

2779 (100 %)

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

4097 (100 %)

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

11545 (100 %)

Unigine Heaven 3.0

Benchmark Unigine Heaven 3.0: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Unigine Heaven 3.0 test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

1355 (100 %)

User rating

4.6 Out of 257 Hitesti Score
4.3 Out of 157 Hitesti Score