GeForce GT 320 OEM
VS
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
GeForce GT 320 OEM
VS
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between GeForce GT 320 OEM  vs  ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650.

not rated
Place in performance rating
782
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Terascale 1
no data
Code name
M96
no data
Type
Laptop
2 February 2010 (11 years ago)
Release date
9 January 2009 (12 years ago)
GT215
GPU code name
M96
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between GeForce GT 320 OEM  vs  ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
320
540 MHz
Core clock speed
550 MHz
no data
Transistor count
514 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
12.96
Texture fill rate
16.00
187.49 gflops
Floating-point performance
320.0 gflops
72
Pipelines / CUDA cores
320
727 million
Number of transistors
514 million
43 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
35 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards GeForce GT 320 OEM and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
175 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data
no data
Laptop size
medium sized

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between GeForce GT 320 OEM vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650.

GDDR3
Memory type
GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1580 MHz
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
25.28 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
19.2 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between GeForce GT 320 OEM vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650.

1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Display Connectors
No outputs
+
HDMI
no data

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

1.2
CUDA
no data
no data
PowerPlay
+
no data
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI
+
no data
PCI-E 2.0 x16
+
no data
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports
+
no data
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders GeForce GT 320 OEM and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
Vulkan
no data
4.1
Shader Model
no data
1.1
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for GeForce GT 320 OEM and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the GeForce GT 320 OEM or ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) GeForce GT 320 OEM
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Death Stranding (2020) GeForce GT 320 OEM
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
F1 2020 (2020) GeForce GT 320 OEM
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Gears Tactics (2020) GeForce GT 320 OEM
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Doom Eternal (2020) GeForce GT 320 OEM
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of GeForce GT 320 OEM

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 55 nm)

More memory bandwidth (25.28 GB/s vs 19.2 GB/s)

Advantages of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650

2.01% faster in synthetic tests

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 1 GB)

So, GeForce GT 320 OEM or ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 .

GeForce GT 320 OEM versus ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.9 Out of 11 Hitesti Score
4.2 Out of 12 Hitesti Score