ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
VS
Matrox QID LP PCIe
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
VS
Matrox QID LP PCIe

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO  vs  Matrox QID LP PCIe.

1022
Place in performance rating
not rated
TeraScale
Architecture
MP
28 June 2007 (14 years ago)
Release date
17 December 2004 (16 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$799
$130
Price now
no data
0.01
Value for money
no data
RV630
GPU code name
MP-A4
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO  vs  Matrox QID LP PCIe in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

600 MHz
Core clock speed
250 MHz
65 nm
Manufacturing process technology
0 nm
4.800
Texture fill rate
2.000
144 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
120
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
390 million
Number of transistors
no data
35 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and Matrox QID LP PCIe come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
no data
Length
168 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs Matrox QID LP PCIe.

DDR2
Memory type
DDR
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1000 MHz
Memory clock speed
600 MHz
16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
9.6 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs Matrox QID LP PCIe.

2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
1x DVI

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and Matrox QID LP PCIe is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
8.1
no data
OpenGL
1.5
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
OpenCL
N/A

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and Matrox QID LP PCIe graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO or Matrox QID LP PCIe good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Matrox QID LP PCIe
Death Stranding (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Matrox QID LP PCIe
F1 2020 (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Matrox QID LP PCIe
Gears Tactics (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Matrox QID LP PCIe
Doom Eternal (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Matrox QID LP PCIe
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

1.79% faster in synthetic tests

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 128 MB)

More memory bandwidth (16 GB/s vs 9.6 GB/s)

Advantages of Matrox QID LP PCIe

There is no accountable advantage

So, ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO or Matrox QID LP PCIe?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO .

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO versus Matrox QID LP PCIe performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.7 Out of 57 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score