ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
VS
GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
VS
GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO  vs  GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache.

1022
Place in performance rating
not rated
TeraScale
Architecture
Curie
28 June 2007 (14 years ago)
Release date
15 December 2004 (17 years ago)
$130
Price now
no data
0.01
Value for money
no data
RV630
GPU code name
NV44 A2
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO  vs  GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

600 MHz
Core clock speed
350 MHz
65 nm
Manufacturing process technology
110 nm
4.800
Texture fill rate
1.400
144 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
120
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
390 million
Number of transistors
75 million
35 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache.

DDR2
Memory type
DDR
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
64 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
1000 MHz
Memory clock speed
500 MHz
16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
4 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache.

2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
no data
OpenGL
2.1
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
3.0
no data
OpenCL
N/A

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO or GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache
Death Stranding (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache
F1 2020 (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache
Gears Tactics (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache
Doom Eternal (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

1.79% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (65 nm vs 110 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 64 MB)

More memory bandwidth (16 GB/s vs 4 GB/s)

Advantages of GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache

There is no accountable advantage

So, ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO or GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO .

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO versus GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.7 Out of 57 Hitesti Score
3.0 Out of 3 Hitesti Score