ATI FireGL V7300
VS
AMD Radeon R5 M240
ATI FireGL V7300
VS
AMD Radeon R5 M240

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between ATI FireGL V7300  vs  AMD Radeon R5 M240.

2162
Place in performance rating
901
0.27
Value for money (0-100)
no data
R500
Architecture
GCN
R520
Code name
Jet
Workstation
Type
Laptop
1 October 2005
Release date
1 September 2014 (7 years ago)
$1,599
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$99
Price now
no data
no data
GPU code name
Jet XT / Sun
no data
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between ATI FireGL V7300  vs  AMD Radeon R5 M240 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
320
594 MHz
Core clock speed
1030 MHz
321 million
Transistor count
690 million
90 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
97 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
9.504
Texture fill rate
20.60
no data
Floating-point performance
659.2 gflops
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
320
no data
Number of transistors
690 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards ATI FireGL V7300 and AMD Radeon R5 M240 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
229 mm
Length
no data
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
no data
no data
Bus support
Not Listed

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between ATI FireGL V7300 vs AMD Radeon R5 M240.

GDDR3
Memory type
Not Listed
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
256 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
1296 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
41.47 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between ATI FireGL V7300 vs AMD Radeon R5 M240.

2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
Eyefinity
+

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
AppAcceleration
+
no data
HD3D
+
no data
PowerTune
+
no data
TrueAudio
-
no data
ZeroCore
+
no data
Enduro
-
no data
DualGraphics
1
no data
Switchable graphics
1
no data
PowerPlay
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders ATI FireGL V7300 and AMD Radeon R5 M240 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
DirectX® 11
2.0
OpenGL
4.4
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
Not Listed
no data
Mantle
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for ATI FireGL V7300 and AMD Radeon R5 M240 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the ATI FireGL V7300 or AMD Radeon R5 M240 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) ATI FireGL V7300
AMD Radeon R5 M240
Death Stranding (2020) ATI FireGL V7300
AMD Radeon R5 M240
F1 2020 (2020) ATI FireGL V7300
AMD Radeon R5 M240
Gears Tactics (2020) ATI FireGL V7300
AMD Radeon R5 M240
Doom Eternal (2020) ATI FireGL V7300
AMD Radeon R5 M240
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of ATI FireGL V7300

More memory bandwidth (41.47 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 M240

2.13% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 90 nm)

So, ATI FireGL V7300 or AMD Radeon R5 M240?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R5 M240 .

ATI FireGL V7300 versus AMD Radeon R5 M240 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 3 Hitesti Score