AMD Radeon R7 M260X
VS
AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon R7 M260X
VS
AMD Cedar

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Radeon R7 M260X  vs  AMD Cedar.

666
Place in performance rating
not rated
GCN
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Opal
Code name
Cedar
Laptop
Type
Desktop
7 January 2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
no data
no data
Price now
$17.81
Mars
GPU code name
Cedar
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Radeon R7 M260X  vs  AMD Cedar in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

384
Pipelines
80
715 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
715 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
950 million
Transistor count
292 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
17.16
Texture fill rate
no data
549.1 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
6
Compute units
no data
384
Pipelines / CUDA cores
80
715 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
950 million
Number of transistors
292 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Radeon R7 M260X and AMD Cedar come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x8
Interface
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data
medium sized
Laptop size
no data
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Radeon R7 M260X vs AMD Cedar.

GDDR5
Memory type
no data
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
1000 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
64 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Radeon R7 M260X vs AMD Cedar.

No outputs
Display Connectors
no data

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

-
AppAcceleration
no data
1
FreeSync
no data
+
HD3D
no data
+
PowerTune
no data
-
TrueAudio
no data
+
ZeroCore
no data
-
Enduro
no data
1
DualGraphics
no data
1
Switchable graphics
no data
+
Zero Core
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Radeon R7 M260X and AMD Cedar is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

DirectX® 12
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.3
OpenGL
4.4
5.1
Shader Model
no data
2.0
OpenCL
no data
+
Mantle
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R7 M260X and AMD Cedar graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R7 M260X or AMD Cedar good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R7 M260X
AMD Cedar
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R7 M260X
AMD Cedar
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R7 M260X
AMD Cedar
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R7 M260X
AMD Cedar
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R7 M260X
AMD Cedar
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 M260X

6.19% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (384 vs 80)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

Advantages of AMD Cedar

There is no accountable advantage

So, AMD Radeon R7 M260X or AMD Cedar?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R7 M260X .

AMD Radeon R7 M260X versus AMD Cedar performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Ice Storm GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

4.3 Out of 7 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 2 Hitesti Score