AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
VS
AMD Cayman
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
VS
AMD Cayman

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150  vs  AMD Cayman.

502
Place in performance rating
not rated
Polaris
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Polaris 11
Code name
Cayman
Mobile workstation
Type
Desktop
1 March 2017 (4 years ago)
Release date
no data
$2000
Price now
$17.44
0.88
Value for money
no data
Polaris 11
GPU code name
Cayman
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150  vs  AMD Cayman in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

896
Pipelines
1536
1053 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
no data
Transistor count
2,640 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
58.97
Texture fill rate
no data
896
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1536
1053 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
3,000 million
Number of transistors
2,640 million
50 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 and AMD Cayman come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x8
Interface
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data
medium sized
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs AMD Cayman.

GDDR5
Memory type
no data
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
7000 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
96 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs AMD Cayman.

No outputs
Display Connectors
no data

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

+
FreeSync
no data
+
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 and AMD Cayman is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2.131
Vulkan
no data
6.4
Shader Model
no data
2.0
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 and AMD Cayman graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 or AMD Cayman good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
AMD Cayman
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
AMD Cayman
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
AMD Cayman
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
AMD Cayman
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
AMD Cayman
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150

8.67% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 40 nm)

Advantages of AMD Cayman

Cheaper ($17.44 vs $2000)

More pipelines (1536 vs 896)

So, AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 or AMD Cayman?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 .

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 versus AMD Cayman performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.8 Out of 4 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score