AMD FirePro W2100
VS
Riva TNT
AMD FirePro W2100
VS
Riva TNT

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD FirePro W2100  vs  Riva TNT.

682
Place in performance rating
not rated
10.86
Value for money (0-100)
no data
GCN
Architecture
Fahrenheit
Oland
Code name
no data
Desktop
Type
no data
2 October 2015 (6 years ago)
Release date
23 March 1998 (23 years ago)
$99
Price now
$146
4.19
Value for money
no data
Mars
GPU code name
NV4
Workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD FirePro W2100  vs  Riva TNT in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

320
Pipelines
no data
680 MHz
Core clock speed
90 MHz
680 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
950 million
Transistor count
no data
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
350 nm
26 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
13.60
Texture fill rate
0.18
435.2 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
320
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
680 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
950 million
Number of transistors
7 million
400 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD FirePro W2100 and Riva TNT come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x8
Interface
AGP 2x
None
Supplementary power connectors
None
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
no data
low profile / half length
Form factor
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD FirePro W2100 vs Riva TNT.

n/a
Memory type
SDR
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
16 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1800 MHz
Memory clock speed
110 MHz
28.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
1.76 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD FirePro W2100 vs Riva TNT.

2x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
1x VGA
1
Dual-link DVI support
no data
2
DisplayPort count
no data

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

+
AppAcceleration
no data
+
PowerPlay
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD FirePro W2100 and Riva TNT is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_1)
DirectX
5.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.2
1.2.131
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
N/A

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD FirePro W2100 and Riva TNT graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD FirePro W2100 or Riva TNT good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD FirePro W2100
Riva TNT
Death Stranding (2020) AMD FirePro W2100
Riva TNT
F1 2020 (2020) AMD FirePro W2100
Riva TNT
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD FirePro W2100
Riva TNT
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD FirePro W2100
Riva TNT
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD FirePro W2100

5.18% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($99 vs $146)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 350 nm)

More memory bandwidth (28.8 GB/s vs 1.76 GB/s)

Advantages of Riva TNT

More maximum RAM amount (16 MB vs 2 GB)

So, AMD FirePro W2100 or Riva TNT?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro W2100 .

AMD FirePro W2100 versus Riva TNT performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Unigine Heaven 3.0

Benchmark Unigine Heaven 3.0: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Unigine Heaven 3.0 test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.9 Out of 9 Hitesti Score
4.5 Out of 8 Hitesti Score