AMD Cypress
VS
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
AMD Cypress
VS
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Cypress  vs  AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop).

not rated
Place in performance rating
498
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN
Cypress
Code name
Kaveri Spectre
Desktop
Type
Desktop
no data
Release date
14 January 2014 (7 years ago)
$12.72
Price now
no data
Cypress
GPU code name
Kaveri Spectre
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Cypress  vs  AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

1600
Pipelines
384
no data
Core clock speed
720 MHz
2,154 million
Transistor count
no data
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
1600
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
2,154 million
Number of transistors
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Cypress vs AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop).

no data
Shared memory
+

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
DirectCompute 5.0
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Cypress and AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2
4.4
OpenGL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cypress and AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cypress or AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cypress
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cypress
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cypress
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cypress
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cypress
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cypress

More pipelines (1600 vs 384)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

6.11% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Cypress or AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) .

AMD Cypress versus AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Ice Storm GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Unigine Heaven 3.0

Benchmark Unigine Heaven 3.0: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Unigine Heaven 3.0 test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
2.3 Out of 4 Hitesti Score