AMD Cedar
VS
AMD Radeon E8950
AMD Cedar
VS
AMD Radeon E8950

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Cedar  vs  AMD Radeon E8950.

not rated
Place in performance rating
not rated
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Cedar
Code name
Amethyst
Desktop
Type
Desktop
no data
Release date
29 September 2015 (6 years ago)
$17.81
Price now
no data
Cedar
GPU code name
Amethyst
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Cedar  vs  AMD Radeon E8950 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

80
Pipelines
2048
no data
Core clock speed
735 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
292 million
Transistor count
5,000 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
95 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
128.0
no data
Floating-point performance
4,096 gflops
80
Pipelines / CUDA cores
2048
no data
Boost clock speed
1000 MHz
292 million
Number of transistors
5,000 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
95 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Cedar and AMD Radeon E8950 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Cedar vs AMD Radeon E8950.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
192.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Cedar vs AMD Radeon E8950.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Cedar and AMD Radeon E8950 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cedar and AMD Radeon E8950 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cedar or AMD Radeon E8950 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon E8950
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon E8950
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon E8950
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon E8950
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon E8950
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cedar

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of AMD Radeon E8950

More pipelines (2048 vs 80)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Cedar or AMD Radeon E8950?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Cedar .

AMD Cedar versus AMD Radeon E8950 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

5.0 Out of 2 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score