3D Rage
VS
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
3D Rage
VS
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between 3D Rage  vs  Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645.

not rated
Place in performance rating
581
Mach
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
no data
Code name
Coffee Lake GT3e
no data
Type
Laptop
1 April 1996 (25 years ago)
Release date
10 July 2019 (2 years ago)
$9.95
Price now
no data
Mach64 GT
GPU code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between 3D Rage  vs  Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
384
44 MHz
Core clock speed
300 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
500 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
0.04
Texture fill rate
50.40
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
48
no data
Boost clock speed
1150 MHz
5 million
Number of transistors
no data
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards 3D Rage and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCI
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between 3D Rage vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645.

EDO
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
2 MB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
64 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
57 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
456.0 MB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
no data
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between 3D Rage vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645.

1x VGA
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
Quick Sync
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders 3D Rage and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

5.0
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
Vulkan
1.1.103
no data
Shader Model
6.4
N/A
OpenCL
2.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for 3D Rage and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the 3D Rage or Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) 3D Rage
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Death Stranding (2020) 3D Rage
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
F1 2020 (2020) 3D Rage
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Gears Tactics (2020) 3D Rage
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Doom Eternal (2020) 3D Rage
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of 3D Rage

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

7.14% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 500 nm)

So, 3D Rage or Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 .

3D Rage versus Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

1.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score
2.6 Out of 37 Hitesti Score