AMD Radeon R7 350
VS
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
AMD Radeon R7 350
VS
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Radeon R7 350  vs  Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645.

not rated
Place in performance rating
581
0.08
Value for money (0-100)
no data
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Cape Verde
Code name
Coffee Lake GT3e
Desktop
Type
Laptop
6 July 2016 (5 years ago)
Release date
10 July 2019 (2 years ago)
$12.88
Price now
no data
Cape Verde
GPU code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Radeon R7 350  vs  Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

512
Pipelines
384
800 MHz
Core clock speed
300 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1,500 million
Transistor count
no data
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
55 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
25.60
Texture fill rate
50.40
819.2 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
512
Pipelines / CUDA cores
48
no data
Boost clock speed
1150 MHz
1,500 million
Number of transistors
no data
55 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Radeon R7 350 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
168 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Radeon R7 350 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645.

GDDR5
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
4500 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
72 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
no data
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Radeon R7 350 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645.

1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs
+
HDMI
no data

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
Quick Sync
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Radeon R7 350 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.1.103
no data
Shader Model
6.4
no data
OpenCL
2.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R7 350 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R7 350 or Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R7 350
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R7 350
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R7 350
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R7 350
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R7 350
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 350

More pipelines (512 vs 384)

Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

6.12% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 55 Watt)

So, AMD Radeon R7 350 or Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 .

AMD Radeon R7 350 versus Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

4.4 Out of 35 Hitesti Score
2.6 Out of 37 Hitesti Score