18800-1
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
18800-1
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between 18800-1  vs  NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M.

not rated
Place in performance rating
1014
Wonder
Architecture
GT2xx
no data
Code name
GT216
no data
Type
Mobile workstation
no data
Release date
7 January 2010 (11 years ago)
no data
Price now
$980
18800-1
GPU code name
N10P-GLM
Desktop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between 18800-1  vs  NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
48
no data
Core clock speed
550 MHz
no data
Transistor count
486 million
800 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
8.800
no data
Floating-point performance
116.16 gflops
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
48
no data
Number of transistors
486 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
35 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards 18800-1 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
no data
Laptop size
medium sized

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between 18800-1 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M.

no data
Memory type
GDDR3, DDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
790 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
25.28 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between 18800-1 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders 18800-1 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
Vulkan
no data
N/A
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for 18800-1 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the 18800-1 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) 18800-1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
Death Stranding (2020) 18800-1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
F1 2020 (2020) 18800-1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
Gears Tactics (2020) 18800-1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
Doom Eternal (2020) 18800-1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of 18800-1

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

2.03% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 800 nm)

So, 18800-1 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M .

18800-1 versus NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 2 Hitesti Score
3.2 Out of 6 Hitesti Score