NVIDIA Quadro M2000
VS
AMD FirePro W7000
NVIDIA Quadro M2000
VS
AMD FirePro W7000

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro M2000  vs  AMD FirePro W7000.

303
Place in performance rating
287
15.21
Value for money (0-100)
18.08
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GM206
Code name
Pitcairn
Workstation
Type
Workstation
8 April 2016 (5 years ago)
Release date
13 June 2012 (9 years ago)
$437.75
Launch price (MSRP)
$899
$680 (1.6x MSRP)
Price now
$298 (0.3x MSRP)
6.14
Value for money
7.09
GM206
GPU code name
Pitcairn
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro M2000  vs  AMD FirePro W7000 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

768
Pipelines
1280
796 MHz
Core clock speed
950 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
2,940 million
Transistor count
2,800 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
75 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
55.82
Texture fill rate
76.00
1,812 gflops
Floating-point performance
2,432 gflops
768
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1280
1163 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
2,940 million
Number of transistors
2,800 million
75 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
350 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and AMD FirePro W7000 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
201 mm
Length
242 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
1" (2.5 cm)
Width
no data
no data
Form factor
full height / full length

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs AMD FirePro W7000.

128 Bit
Memory type
GDDR5
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
6612 MHz
Memory clock speed
4800 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
153.6 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs AMD FirePro W7000.

DP DP DP DP
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
4
Number of simultaneous displays
no data
no data
StereoOutput3D
1
no data
Dual-link DVI support
1
no data
DisplayPort count
4

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

5.2
CUDA
no data
+
3D Vision Pro
no data
+
Mosaic
no data
+
nView Desktop Management
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and AMD FirePro W7000 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.5
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
no data
5
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and AMD FirePro W7000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro M2000 or AMD FirePro W7000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M2000
AMD FirePro W7000
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M2000
AMD FirePro W7000
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M2000
AMD FirePro W7000
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M2000
AMD FirePro W7000
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M2000
AMD FirePro W7000
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Less power consumption (75 Watt vs 350 Watt)

Advantages of AMD FirePro W7000

0.11% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($298 (0.3x MSRP) vs $680 (1.6x MSRP))

More pipelines (1280 vs 768)

So, NVIDIA Quadro M2000 or AMD FirePro W7000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro W7000 .

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 versus AMD FirePro W7000 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.9 Out of 19 Hitesti Score
4.0 Out of 5 Hitesti Score