Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+
VS
Intel Core i5-3320M
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+
VS
Intel Core i5-3320M

Which to select

It is time to pick the winner. What is the difference between Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ vs Intel Core i5-3320M? What CPU is more powerful? It is quite easy to determine – look at comparison table. The processor with more cores/ threads and also with higher frequency is the absolute winner!

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Who will win between Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ vs  Intel Core i5-3320M. The general performance of a CPU can easily be determined based on the number of its cores and the thread count, as well as the base frequency and Turbo frequency. The more GHz and cores a CPU has, the better. Please note that high technical specs require using a powerful cooling system.

1.80 GHz
Frequency
2.60 GHz
8
CPU Cores
2
2.96 GHz
Turbo (1 Core)
3.30 GHz
no data
Turbo (2 Cores)
No turbo
No
Hyperthreading
Yes
No
Overclocking
No
2.42 GHz
Turbo (8 Cores)
no data
hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
Core architecture
no data
1x Cortex-A76
A core
no data
3x Cortex-A76
B core
no data
4x Cortex-A55
C core
no data

CPU generation and family

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+
Name
no data
Mobile
Segment
no data
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
CPU group
no data
Qualcomm Snapdragon
Family
no data
3
Generation
no data
--
Predecessor
no data
--
Successor
no data

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers complement their CPUs with graphic chips, such a solution being especially popular in laptops. The higher the clock frequency of a GPU is and the bigger its memory, the better. Find a winner - Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ vs Intel Core i5-3320M. 

Qualcomm Adreno 642
GPU name
Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU frequency
0.65 GHz
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
1.20 GHz
5
Generation
7
12.0
DirectX Version
11.0
4
Execution units
16
384
Shader
128
no data
Max. Memory
--
1
Max. displays
3
5 nm
Technology
22 nm
Q2/2021
Release date
Q1/2011
4 GB
Max. GPU Memory
no data

Hardware codec support

Here we deal with specs that are used by some CPU manufacturers. These numbers are mainly technical and can be neglected for the purpose of the comparison analysis.

Decode / Encode
h264
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
JPEG
Decode
no data
h265 8bit
No
no data
h265 10bit
No
Decode / Encode
VP8
No
Decode / Encode
VP9
No
Decode
VC-1
Decode
Decode
AVC
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
no data
Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
no data
No
AV1
no data

Memory & PCIe

These are memory standards supported by CPUs. The higher such standards, the better a CPU’s performance is.

LPDDR4X-4266
Memory type
DDR3-1066 DDR3-1333 DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
16 GB
Max. Memory
32 GB
4
Memory channels
2
No
ECC
No
PCIe version
3.0
PCIe lanes
16

Encryption

Data encryption support

No
AES-NI
Yes

Memory & AMP; PCIe

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP), sometimes called thermal design point, is the maximum amount of heat generated by a computer chip or component (often a CPU, GPU or system on a chip) that the cooling system in a computer is designed to dissipate under any workload.

no data
TDP
35 W
--
Tjunction max.
105 °C
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--
--
TDP (PL2)
no data

Technical details

8
CPU Threads
4
3.00 MB
L3-Cache
3.00 MB
7 nm
Technology
22 nm
Kryo 485
Architecture
Ivy Bridge
None
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
N/A
Socket
BGA 1023
Q4/2018
Release date
Q2/2012
no data
Market price
ca. 225 $
x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
no data
2.00 MB
L2-Cache
no data
SM8150-AC
Part Number
no data

Devices using this processor

You probably know already what devices use CPUs. These can be a desktop or a laptop.

OnePlus 7T OnePlus 7T Pro 5G OnePlus 7 Pro OnePlus 7T Pro Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro Premium Edition Realme X2 Pro
Used in
Unknown

Compatibility

Technologies and extensions

Virtualization technologies

Memory specs

Peripherals

AnTuTu 8 benchmark

Phones with best AnTuTu scores. These cell phones are the ones that have obtained the highest score in the well-known AnTuTu ranking

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors. The result is the estimated computing power in the Single-Precision FP32 mode