Intel Xeon W-2255
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 4700G
VS

Which to select

It is time to pick the winner. What is the difference between Intel Xeon W-2255 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4700G? What CPU is more powerful? It is quite easy to determine – look at comparison table. The processor with more cores/ threads and also with higher frequency is the absolute winner!

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Who will win between Intel Xeon W-2255 vs  AMD Ryzen 7 4700G. The general performance of a CPU can easily be determined based on the number of its cores and the thread count, as well as the base frequency and Turbo frequency. The more GHz and cores a CPU has, the better. Please note that high technical specs require using a powerful cooling system.

3.70 GHz
Frequency
3.60 GHz
10
CPU Cores
8
4.70 GHz
Turbo (1 Core)
4.40 GHz
20
CPU Threads
16
Yes
Hyperthreading
Yes
No
Overclocking
Yes
no data
Turbo (8 Cores)
4.00 GHz
4.40 GHz
Turbo (10 Cores)
no data
normal
Core architecture
no data
0x
A core
no data
0x
B core
no data

CPU generation and family

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers complement their CPUs with graphic chips, such a solution being especially popular in laptops. The higher the clock frequency of a GPU is and the bigger its memory, the better. Find a winner - Intel Xeon W-2255 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4700G. 

GPU name
AMD Radeon 8 Graphics (Renoir)
GPU frequency
2.10 GHz
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
Generation
9
DirectX Version
12
Execution units
8
Shader
512
--
Max. Memory
2 GB
Max. displays
3
Technology
7 nm
Release date
Q1/2020

Hardware codec support

Here we deal with specs that are used by some CPU manufacturers. These numbers are mainly technical and can be neglected for the purpose of the comparison analysis.

No
h264
Decode / Encode
No
JPEG
Decode / Encode
no data
h265 8bit
Decode / Encode
no data
h265 10bit
Decode / Encode
No
VP8
Decode / Encode
No
VP9
Decode / Encode
No
VC-1
Decode
No
AVC
Decode / Encode
No
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
no data
No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
no data
No
AV1
no data

Memory & PCIe

These are memory standards supported by CPUs. The higher such standards, the better a CPU’s performance is.

DDR4-2933
Memory type
DDR4-3200
1024 GB
Max. Memory
32 GB
4
Memory channels
2
Yes
ECC
No
3.0
PCIe version
3.0
48
PCIe lanes
12

Encryption

Data encryption support

Yes
AES-NI
Yes

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP), sometimes called thermal design point, is the maximum amount of heat generated by a computer chip or component (often a CPU, GPU or system on a chip) that the cooling system in a computer is designed to dissipate under any workload.

no data
TDP
65 W
--
Tjunction max.
100 °C
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--
165 W
TDP (PL1)
no data
--
TDP (PL2)
no data

Technical details

19.25 MB
L3-Cache
8.00 MB
14 nm
Technology
7 nm
Cascade Lake SP
Architecture
Renoir (Zen 2)
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d, vPro
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV
LGA 2066
Socket
FP6
Q4/2019
Release date
Q3/2020
ca. 778 $
Market price
x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
no data
--
L2-Cache
no data

Devices using this processor

You probably know already what devices use CPUs. These can be a desktop or a laptop.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

It is the updated version of the Cinebench R15 benchmark. This version provides improved benchmark accuracy at testing of processors. Cinebench R20 is based on Cinema 4 Suite. It is the software used to create 3D forms. The benchmark runs for single-core test procedure without counting of hyperthreading ability.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is the new version of the benchmark which is developed on the basis of Cinebench R15 (both versions are operated on the basis of Cinema 4 - the most popular 3D modeling software). Cinebench R20 is used for multi-core processor performance benchmark tests and hyperthreading ability.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

It is the updated version of Cinebench 11.5. As all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite software. The latter is used for creation of 3D models and forms. Cinebench R15 is used for single-core processor performance benchmark test. The hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

This benchmark is the updated version of the Cinebench 11.5 which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft (it is widely used for 3D production). Cinebench R15 can be used for multi-core processor performance benchmark testing. The test produces precise and accurate results.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors. The result is the estimated computing power in the Single-Precision FP32 mode. The computing power in games can vary despite the differences in the capacity of videocards.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 benchmark is the newest software suit. It allows to account for the effect of memory performance on processor performance. Completely new algorithms provide the quite accurate benchmark testing results of the single-core CPU.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 software suite shows benchmark testing results of the memory performance and speed of the multi-core processor. The higher the GeekBench score, the better processor. Here the hyperthreading ability is counted.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

We use Blender benchmark to trace performance of the central processing unit. Blender is the software for professional rendering and creating of 3D bodies which can also be animated. The testing results show you how fast the unit runs on the implementation of the multi-processing tasks. Here everything works on the principle that the faster rendering for 3D scenes, the better.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

PassMark is one of the most popular benchmark in the world. It tests entire and overall performance of the central processing unit (mathematical calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphic tests). Below you will see benchmark testing results for the processor and its score. Please note that data can differ from the real-world situations.