Intel Celeron J4125
VS
Intel Celeron N5095
Intel Celeron J4125
VS
Intel Celeron N5095

Which to select

It is time to pick the winner. What is the difference between Intel Celeron J4125 vs Intel Celeron N5095? What CPU is more powerful? It is quite easy to determine – look at comparison table. The processor with more cores/ threads and also with higher frequency is the absolute winner!

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Who will win between Intel Celeron J4125 vs  Intel Celeron N5095. The general performance of a CPU can easily be determined based on the number of its cores and the thread count, as well as the base frequency and Turbo frequency. The more GHz and cores a CPU has, the better. Please note that high technical specs require using a powerful cooling system.

2.00 GHz
Frequency
2.00 GHz
4
CPU Cores
4
2.70 GHz
Turbo (1 Core)
2.90 GHz
4
CPU Threads
4
No
Hyperthreading
No
No
Overclocking
No
2.70 GHz
Turbo (4 Cores)
2.50 GHz
Core architecture
normal
A core
--
B core
--
C core
--

CPU generation and family

Name
Intel Celeron N5095
Segment
Mobile
CPU group
Intel Celeron N5000
Family
Intel Celeron
Generation
10
Predecessor
--
Successor
--

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers complement their CPUs with graphic chips, such a solution being especially popular in laptops. The higher the clock frequency of a GPU is and the bigger its memory, the better. Find a winner - Intel Celeron J4125 vs Intel Celeron N5095. 

Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU name
Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Elkhart Lake)
0.25 GHz
GPU frequency
0.45 GHz
0.75 GHz
GPU (Turbo)
0.75 GHz
9.5
Generation
11
12
DirectX Version
12
12
Execution units
16
96
Shader
128
8 GB
Max. Memory
3
Max. displays
3
14 nm
Technology
10 nm
Q4/2017
Release date
Q1/2021
Max. GPU Memory
--

Hardware codec support

Here we deal with specs that are used by some CPU manufacturers. These numbers are mainly technical and can be neglected for the purpose of the comparison analysis.

Decode / Encode
h264
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
JPEG
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
h265 8bit
Decode / Encode
h265 10bit
Decode / Encode
VP8
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
VP9
Decode / Encode
Decode
VC-1
Decode
Decode / Encode
AVC
Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
Decode / Encode
AV1
Decode

Memory & PCIe

These are memory standards supported by CPUs. The higher such standards, the better a CPU’s performance is.

DDR4-2400LPDDR4-2400
Memory type
DDR4-2933LPDDR4-2933
8 GB
Max. Memory
16 GB
2
Memory channels
2
No
ECC
No
2.0
PCIe version
3.0
6
PCIe lanes
8

Encryption

Data encryption support

Yes
AES-NI
Yes

Memory & AMP; PCIe

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP), sometimes called thermal design point, is the maximum amount of heat generated by a computer chip or component (often a CPU, GPU or system on a chip) that the cooling system in a computer is designed to dissipate under any workload.

10 W
TDP
--
Tjunction max.
--
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--
TDP (PL1)
15 W
TDP (PL2)
--

Technical details

4.00 MB
L3-Cache
4.00 MB
14 nm
Technology
10 nm
Gemini Lake Refresh
Architecture
Jasper Lake
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
BGA 1090
Socket
BGA 1090
Q4/2019
Release date
Q1/2021
Instruction set (ISA)
x86-64 (64 bit)
L2-Cache
1.50 MB
Part Number
--
ISA extensions
SSE4.1, SSE4.2

Devices using this processor

You probably know already what devices use CPUs. These can be a desktop or a laptop.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

The latter is used for creation of 3D models and forms. Cinebench R15 is used for single-core processor performance benchmark test. The hyperthreading ability doesn't count. It is the updated version of Cinebench 11.5. As all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite software

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 can be used for multi-core processor performance benchmark testing. The test produces precise and accurate results. This benchmark is the updated version of the Cinebench 11.5 which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors. The result is the estimated computing power in the Single-Precision FP32 mode