Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
VS
Intel Core i3-1005G1
VS

Which to select

It is time to pick the winner. What is the difference between Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 vs Intel Core i3-1005G1? What CPU is more powerful? It is quite easy to determine – look at comparison table. The processor with more cores/ threads and also with higher frequency is the absolute winner!

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Who will win between Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 vs  Intel Core i3-1005G1. The general performance of a CPU can easily be determined based on the number of its cores and the thread count, as well as the base frequency and Turbo frequency. The more GHz and cores a CPU has, the better. Please note that high technical specs require using a powerful cooling system.

2.70 GHz
Frequency
1.20 GHz
24
CPU Cores
2
3.70 GHz
Turbo (1 Core)
3.40 GHz
48
CPU Threads
4
no data
Turbo (2 Cores)
3.40 GHz
Yes
Hyperthreading
Yes
No
Overclocking
No
3.00 GHz
Turbo (24 Cores)
no data
normal
Core architecture
no data
0x
A core
no data
0x
B core
no data

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers complement their CPUs with graphic chips, such a solution being especially popular in laptops. The higher the clock frequency of a GPU is and the bigger its memory, the better. Find a winner - Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 vs Intel Core i3-1005G1. 

GPU name
Intel UHD Graphics (Ice Lake G1)
GPU frequency
0.30 GHz
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
0.90 GHz
Generation
11
DirectX Version
12
Execution units
64
Shader
512
--
Max. Memory
--
Max. displays
3
Technology
10 nm
Release date
Q3/2019

Hardware codec support

Here we deal with specs that are used by some CPU manufacturers. These numbers are mainly technical and can be neglected for the purpose of the comparison analysis.

No
h264
Decode / Encode
No
JPEG
Decode / Encode
no data
h265 8bit
Decode / Encode
no data
h265 10bit
Decode / Encode
No
VP8
Decode / Encode
No
VP9
Decode / Encode
No
VC-1
Decode
No
AVC
Decode / Encode
No
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
no data
No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
no data
No
AV1
no data

Memory & PCIe

These are memory standards supported by CPUs. The higher such standards, the better a CPU’s performance is.

DDR4-2666
Memory type
DDR4-3200 LPDDR4-3733
Max. Memory
64 GB
6
Memory channels
2
Yes
ECC
No
3.0
PCIe version
3.0
48
PCIe lanes
16

Encryption

Data encryption support

Yes
AES-NI
Yes

Thermal Management

These are key parameters that will help you determine which CPU is better. Pay special attention to the release date, technological aspects of the manufacturing process (measured in nanometers), and the third-level cache (L3).

no data
TDP
15 W
--
Tjunction max.
100 °C
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
13 W
205 W
TDP (PL1)
no data
--
TDP (PL2)
no data

Technical details

33.00 MB
L3-Cache
4.00 MB
14 nm
Technology
10nm
Skylake SP
Architecture
Ice Lake U
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d, vPro
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
LGA 3647
Socket
BGA 1526
Q3/2017
Release date
Q3/2019
ca. 5900 $
Market price
ca. 265 $
x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
no data
--
L2-Cache
no data

Devices using this processor

You probably know already what devices use CPUs. These can be a desktop or a laptop.

Unknown
Used in
Microsoft Surface Pro 7

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

It is the updated version of the Cinebench R15 benchmark. This version provides improved benchmark accuracy at testing of processors. Cinebench R20 is based on Cinema 4 Suite. It is the software used to create 3D forms. The benchmark runs for single-core test procedure without counting of hyperthreading ability.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is the new version of the benchmark which is developed on the basis of Cinebench R15 (both versions are operated on the basis of Cinema 4 - the most popular 3D modeling software). Cinebench R20 is used for multi-core processor performance benchmark tests and hyperthreading ability.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

It is the updated version of Cinebench 11.5. As all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite software. The latter is used for creation of 3D models and forms. Cinebench R15 is used for single-core processor performance benchmark test. The hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

This benchmark is the updated version of the Cinebench 11.5 which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft (it is widely used for 3D production). Cinebench R15 can be used for multi-core processor performance benchmark testing. The test produces precise and accurate results.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors. The result is the estimated computing power in the Single-Precision FP32 mode. The computing power in games can vary despite the differences in the capacity of videocards.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 benchmark is the newest software suit. It allows to account for the effect of memory performance on processor performance. Completely new algorithms provide the quite accurate benchmark testing results of the single-core CPU.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 software suite shows benchmark testing results of the memory performance and speed of the multi-core processor. The higher the GeekBench score, the better processor. Here the hyperthreading ability is counted.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 benchmark supports AMD and Intel multi-core processors. Being based on MAXON CINEMA 4D, it allows obtaining the real comparative CPU potential. The higher the indicator, the more powerful and fast the processor is.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 carries out simultaneous cross-platform tests on all the processor’s cores. By running realistic 3D scenes, this benchmark will reveal all the potential of your Intel or AMD single-unit processor. The winner is quite easy to identify - the higher the estimation, the faster the CPU is.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

PassMark is one of the most popular benchmark in the world. It tests entire and overall performance of the central processing unit (mathematical calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphic tests). Below you will see benchmark testing results for the processor and its score. Please note that data can differ from the real-world situations.

COMMENTS

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Pentium 7505 Intel Core i3-1005G1 Intel Pentium 7505 - vs - Intel Core i3-1005G1
2. Intel Core i3-1005G1 Intel Core i9-10900KF Intel Core i3-1005G1 - vs - Intel Core i9-10900KF
3. Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 AMD Ryzen 7 4700G Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 - vs - AMD Ryzen 7 4700G
4. Intel Core i3-1005G1 AMD A8-7650K Intel Core i3-1005G1 - vs - AMD A8-7650K
5. AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B - vs - Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
6. Intel Core i3-1005G1 Intel Core i3-10110U Intel Core i3-1005G1 - vs - Intel Core i3-10110U
7. AMD A10-4600M Intel Core i3-1005G1 AMD A10-4600M - vs - Intel Core i3-1005G1
8. AMD A10-5745M Intel Core i3-1005G1 AMD A10-5745M - vs - Intel Core i3-1005G1
9. Intel Core i3-1115G4 Intel Core i3-1005G1 Intel Core i3-1115G4 - vs - Intel Core i3-1005G1
10. AMD A10-5757M Intel Core i3-1005G1 AMD A10-5757M - vs - Intel Core i3-1005G1
11. Intel Xeon Silver 4210 Intel Core i3-1005G1 Intel Xeon Silver 4210 - vs - Intel Core i3-1005G1
12. AMD A10-4655M Intel Core i3-1005G1 AMD A10-4655M - vs - Intel Core i3-1005G1
13. Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 Intel Core i5-10210U Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 - vs - Intel Core i5-10210U
14. Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 Intel Core i3-1005G1 Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 - vs - Intel Core i3-1005G1
15. AMD A10-5750M Intel Core i3-1005G1 AMD A10-5750M - vs - Intel Core i3-1005G1