Intel Xeon Gold 6238R
VS
AMD Epyc 7452
VS

Which to select

It is time to pick the winner. What is the difference between Intel Xeon Gold 6238R vs AMD Epyc 7452? What CPU is more powerful? It is quite easy to determine – look at comparison table. The processor with more cores/ threads and also with higher frequency is the absolute winner!

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Who will win between Intel Xeon Gold 6238R vs  AMD Epyc 7452. The general performance of a CPU can easily be determined based on the number of its cores and the thread count, as well as the base frequency and Turbo frequency. The more GHz and cores a CPU has, the better. Please note that high technical specs require using a powerful cooling system.

2.20 GHz
Frequency
2.35 GHz
28
CPU Cores
32
4.00 GHz
Turbo (1 Core)
3.35 GHz
56
CPU Threads
64
Yes
Hyperthreading
Yes
No
Overclocking
No
no data
Turbo (32 Cores)
2.65 GHz
normal
Core architecture
no data
0x
A core
no data
0x
B core
no data
2.40 GHz
Turbo (28 Cores)
no data

CPU generation and family

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers complement their CPUs with graphic chips, such a solution being especially popular in laptops. The higher the clock frequency of a GPU is and the bigger its memory, the better. Find a winner - Intel Xeon Gold 6238R vs AMD Epyc 7452. 

No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
--
Max. Memory
--

Hardware codec support

Here we deal with specs that are used by some CPU manufacturers. These numbers are mainly technical and can be neglected for the purpose of the comparison analysis.

No
h264
No
No
JPEG
No
no data
h265 8bit
No
no data
h265 10bit
No
No
VP8
No
No
VP9
No
No
VC-1
No
No
AVC
No
No
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
no data
No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
no data
No
AV1
no data

Memory & PCIe

These are memory standards supported by CPUs. The higher such standards, the better a CPU’s performance is.

DDR4-2933
Memory type
DDR4-3200
1024 GB
Max. Memory
6
Memory channels
8
Yes
ECC
Yes
3.0
PCIe version
4.0
48
PCIe lanes
128

Encryption

Data encryption support

Yes
AES-NI
Yes

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP), sometimes called thermal design point, is the maximum amount of heat generated by a computer chip or component (often a CPU, GPU or system on a chip) that the cooling system in a computer is designed to dissipate under any workload.

no data
TDP
155 W
76 °C
Tjunction max.
--
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--
165 W
TDP (PL1)
no data
--
TDP (PL2)
no data

Technical details

38.50 MB
L3-Cache
128.00 MB
14 nm
Technology
7 nm
Cascade Lake
Architecture
Rome (Zen 2)
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d, vPro
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV
LGA 3647
Socket
SP3
Q1/2020
Release date
Q3/2019
ca. 2610 $
Market price
ca. 3250 $
x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
no data
--
L2-Cache
no data

Devices using this processor

You probably know already what devices use CPUs. These can be a desktop or a laptop.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

It is the updated version of the Cinebench R15 benchmark. This version provides improved benchmark accuracy at testing of processors. Cinebench R20 is based on Cinema 4 Suite. It is the software used to create 3D forms. The benchmark runs for single-core test procedure without counting of hyperthreading ability.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

PassMark is one of the most popular benchmark in the world. It tests entire and overall performance of the central processing unit (mathematical calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphic tests). Below you will see benchmark testing results for the processor and its score. Please note that data can differ from the real-world situations.