Intel Xeon Gold 6136
VS
Intel Xeon Gold 6240R
Intel Xeon Gold 6136
VS
Intel Xeon Gold 6240R

Which to select

It is time to pick the winner. What is the difference between Intel Xeon Gold 6136 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6240R? What CPU is more powerful? It is quite easy to determine – look at comparison table. The processor with more cores/ threads and also with higher frequency is the absolute winner!

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Who will win between Intel Xeon Gold 6136 vs  Intel Xeon Gold 6240R. The general performance of a CPU can easily be determined based on the number of its cores and the thread count, as well as the base frequency and Turbo frequency. The more GHz and cores a CPU has, the better. Please note that high technical specs require using a powerful cooling system.

3.00 GHz
Frequency
2.40 GHz
12
CPU Cores
24
3.70 GHz
Turbo (1 Core)
4.00 GHz
Yes
Hyperthreading
Yes
No
Overclocking
No
3.30 GHz
Turbo (12 Cores)
no data
no data
Turbo (24 Cores)
2.60 GHz
normal
Core architecture
normal
0x
A core
0x
0x
B core
0x

CPU generation and family

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers complement their CPUs with graphic chips, such a solution being especially popular in laptops. The higher the clock frequency of a GPU is and the bigger its memory, the better. Find a winner - Intel Xeon Gold 6136 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6240R. 

No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
--
Max. Memory
--

Hardware codec support

Here we deal with specs that are used by some CPU manufacturers. These numbers are mainly technical and can be neglected for the purpose of the comparison analysis.

No
h264
No
No
JPEG
No
No
VP8
No
No
VP9
No
No
VC-1
No
No
AVC
No
No
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
No
No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
No
No
AV1
No

Memory & PCIe

These are memory standards supported by CPUs. The higher such standards, the better a CPU’s performance is.

DDR4-2666
Memory type
DDR4-2933
Max. Memory
1024 GB
6
Memory channels
6
Yes
ECC
Yes
3.0
PCIe version
3.0
48
PCIe lanes
48

Encryption

Data encryption support

Yes
AES-NI
Yes

Memory & AMP; PCIe

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP), sometimes called thermal design point, is the maximum amount of heat generated by a computer chip or component (often a CPU, GPU or system on a chip) that the cooling system in a computer is designed to dissipate under any workload.

--
Tjunction max.
76 °C
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--
150 W
TDP (PL1)
165 W
--
TDP (PL2)
--

Technical details

24
CPU Threads
48
25.00 MB
L3-Cache
38.50 MB
14 nm
Technology
14 nm
Skylake SP
Architecture
Cascade Lake
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d, vPro
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d, vPro
LGA 3647
Socket
LGA 3647
Q3/2017
Release date
Q1/2020
ca. 2450 $
Market price
ca. 3950 $
x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
x86-64 (64 bit)
--
L2-Cache
--

Devices using this processor

You probably know already what devices use CPUs. These can be a desktop or a laptop.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

Compatibility

Technologies and extensions

Virtualization technologies

Memory specs

Peripherals

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 carries out simultaneous cross-platform tests on all the processor’s cores. By running realistic 3D scenes, this benchmark will reveal all the potential of your Intel or AMD single-unit processor

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 can be used for multi-core processor performance benchmark testing. The test produces precise and accurate results. This benchmark is the updated version of the Cinebench 11.5 which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 benchmark supports AMD and Intel multi-core processors. Being based on MAXON CINEMA 4D, it allows obtaining the real comparative CPU potential

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

It tests entire and overall performance of the central processing unit (mathematical calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphic tests). Please note that data can differ from the real-world situations.