Intel Pentium Gold 6405U
VS
Intel Core i3-4012Y
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U
VS
Intel Core i3-4012Y

Which to select

It is time to pick the winner. What is the difference between Intel Pentium Gold 6405U vs Intel Core i3-4012Y? What CPU is more powerful? It is quite easy to determine – look at comparison table. The processor with more cores/ threads and also with higher frequency is the absolute winner!

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Who will win between Intel Pentium Gold 6405U vs  Intel Core i3-4012Y. The general performance of a CPU can easily be determined based on the number of its cores and the thread count, as well as the base frequency and Turbo frequency. The more GHz and cores a CPU has, the better. Please note that high technical specs require using a powerful cooling system.

2.40 GHz
Frequency
1.50 GHz
2
CPU Cores
2
No turbo
Turbo (1 Core)
No turbo
No turbo
Turbo (2 Cores)
No turbo
Yes
Hyperthreading
Yes
No
Overclocking
No

CPU generation and family

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers complement their CPUs with graphic chips, such a solution being especially popular in laptops. The higher the clock frequency of a GPU is and the bigger its memory, the better. Find a winner - Intel Pentium Gold 6405U vs Intel Core i3-4012Y. 

Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU name
Intel HD Graphics 4200
0.30 GHz
GPU frequency
0.20 GHz
0.95 GHz
GPU (Turbo)
0.85 GHz
9.5
Generation
7.5
12
DirectX Version
11.1
12
Execution units
20
96
Shader
160
64 GB
Max. Memory
2 GB
3
Max. displays
3
14 nm
Technology
22 nm
Q4/2017
Release date
Q2/2013

Hardware codec support

Here we deal with specs that are used by some CPU manufacturers. These numbers are mainly technical and can be neglected for the purpose of the comparison analysis.

Decode / Encode
h264
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
JPEG
Decode
Decode / Encode
h265 8bit
No
Decode / Encode
h265 10bit
No
Decode / Encode
VP8
No
Decode / Encode
VP9
No
Decode
VC-1
Decode
Decode / Encode
AVC
Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

These are memory standards supported by CPUs. The higher such standards, the better a CPU’s performance is.

DDR4-2400LPDDR3-2133
Memory type
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
64 GB
Max. Memory
2
Memory channels
2
No
ECC
No
2.0
PCIe version
2.0
12
PCIe lanes
12

Encryption

Data encryption support

Yes
AES-NI
Yes

Memory & AMP; PCIe

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP), sometimes called thermal design point, is the maximum amount of heat generated by a computer chip or component (often a CPU, GPU or system on a chip) that the cooling system in a computer is designed to dissipate under any workload.

15 W
TDP
11.5 W
100 °C
Tjunction max.
--
--
TDP up
--
12.5 W
TDP down
--

Technical details

4
CPU Threads
4
2.00 MB
L3-Cache
3.00 MB
14 nm
Technology
22 nm
Comet Lake
Architecture
Haswell
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT
BGA 1528
Socket
BGA 1168
Q4/2019
Release date
Q3/2013
ca. 161 $
Market price
ca. 280 $

Devices using this processor

You probably know already what devices use CPUs. These can be a desktop or a laptop.

Lenovo Ideapad 3 17IML05
Used in
Unknown

Compatibility

Technologies and extensions

Virtualization technologies

Memory specs

Peripherals

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

The latter is used for creation of 3D models and forms. Cinebench R15 is used for single-core processor performance benchmark test. The hyperthreading ability doesn't count. It is the updated version of Cinebench 11.5. As all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite software

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 can be used for multi-core processor performance benchmark testing. The test produces precise and accurate results. This benchmark is the updated version of the Cinebench 11.5 which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

It tests entire and overall performance of the central processing unit (mathematical calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphic tests). Please note that data can differ from the real-world situations.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors. The result is the estimated computing power in the Single-Precision FP32 mode