Intel Core i5-10210U
VS
Intel Core i5-1235U
Intel Core i5-10210U
VS
Intel Core i5-1235U

Which to select

It is time to pick the winner. What is the difference between Intel Core i5-10210U vs Intel Core i5-1235U? What CPU is more powerful? It is quite easy to determine – look at comparison table. The processor with more cores/ threads and also with higher frequency is the absolute winner!

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Who will win between Intel Core i5-10210U vs  Intel Core i5-1235U. The general performance of a CPU can easily be determined based on the number of its cores and the thread count, as well as the base frequency and Turbo frequency. The more GHz and cores a CPU has, the better. Please note that high technical specs require using a powerful cooling system.

1.60 GHz
Frequency
1.30 GHz
4
CPU Cores
10
4.20 GHz
Turbo (1 Core)
4.40 GHz
Yes
Hyperthreading
Yes
No
Overclocking
No
3.80 GHz
Turbo (4 Cores)
no data
Turbo (10 Cores)
2.50 GHz
Core architecture
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
A core
2x Golden Cove
B core
8x Gracemont
no data
C core
--

CPU generation and family

no data
Name
Intel Core i5-1235U
no data
Segment
Mobile
no data
CPU group
Intel Core i 1200P/1200U
no data
Family
Intel Core i5
no data
Generation
12
no data
Predecessor
--
no data
Successor
--

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers complement their CPUs with graphic chips, such a solution being especially popular in laptops. The higher the clock frequency of a GPU is and the bigger its memory, the better. Find a winner - Intel Core i5-10210U vs Intel Core i5-1235U. 

Intel UHD Graphics (Comet Lake)
GPU name
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Alder Lake)
0.30 GHz
GPU frequency
0.35 GHz
1.10 GHz
GPU (Turbo)
1.20 GHz
9.5
Generation
13
12
DirectX Version
12.1
24
Execution units
80
192
Shader
640
--
Max. Memory
no data
3
Max. displays
4
14 nm
Technology
10 nm
Q3/2019
Release date
Q1/2022
Max. GPU Memory
64 GB

Hardware codec support

Here we deal with specs that are used by some CPU manufacturers. These numbers are mainly technical and can be neglected for the purpose of the comparison analysis.

Decode / Encode
h264
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
JPEG
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
h265 8bit
no data
Decode / Encode
h265 10bit
no data
Decode / Encode
VP8
Decode
Decode / Encode
VP9
Decode / Encode
Decode
VC-1
Decode
Decode / Encode
AVC
Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
Decode / Encode
AV1
Decode

Memory & PCIe

These are memory standards supported by CPUs. The higher such standards, the better a CPU’s performance is.

DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133, LPDDR4-2933
Memory type
no data
64 GB
Max. Memory
no data
2
Memory channels
no data
No
ECC
no data
3.0
PCIe version
no data
16
PCIe lanes
no data

Encryption

Data encryption support

Yes
AES-NI
Yes

Memory & AMP; PCIe

no data
Memory type
DDR4-3200 DDR5-4800 LPDDR4X-4266 LPDDR5-5200
no data
Max. Memory
64 GB
no data
ECC
No
no data
Memory channels
2
no data
PCIe version
4.0
no data
PCIe lanes
28

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP), sometimes called thermal design point, is the maximum amount of heat generated by a computer chip or component (often a CPU, GPU or system on a chip) that the cooling system in a computer is designed to dissipate under any workload.

15 W
TDP
no data
100 °C
Tjunction max.
100 °C
25 W
TDP up
--
10 W
TDP down
--
TDP (PL1)
15 W
TDP (PL2)
55 W

Technical details

8
CPU Threads
12
6.00 MB
L3-Cache
12.00 MB
14 nm
Technology
10 nm
Comet Lake U
Architecture
Alder Lake U
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
BGA 1526
Socket
BGA 1744
Q3/2019
Release date
Q1/2022
ca. --$
Market price
no data
EM64T
Instruction set (ISA)
x86-64 (64 bit)
1.00 MB
L2-Cache
6.50 MB
individual
Part Number
--
no data
ISA extensions
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2

Devices using this processor

You probably know already what devices use CPUs. These can be a desktop or a laptop.

Notebooks HP, ACER, Lenovo, ASUS, MSI
Used in
Unknown

Compatibility

Technologies and extensions

Virtualization technologies

Memory specs

Peripherals

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

The latter is used for creation of 3D models and forms. Cinebench R15 is used for single-core processor performance benchmark test. The hyperthreading ability doesn't count. It is the updated version of Cinebench 11.5. As all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite software

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 can be used for multi-core processor performance benchmark testing. The test produces precise and accurate results. This benchmark is the updated version of the Cinebench 11.5 which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is based on Cinema 4 Suite. It is the software used to create 3D forms. The benchmark runs for single-core test procedure without counting of hyperthreading ability.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is the new version of the benchmark which is developed on the basis of Cinebench R15 (both versions are operated on the basis of Cinema 4 - the most popular 3D modeling software). Cinebench R20 is used for multi-core processor performance benchmark tests and hyperthreading ability.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 benchmark is the newest software suit. Completely new algorithms provide the quite accurate benchmark testing results of the single-core CPU.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 software suite shows benchmark testing results of the memory performance and speed of the multi-core processor. Here the hyperthreading ability is counted.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

It tests entire and overall performance of the central processing unit (mathematical calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphic tests). Please note that data can differ from the real-world situations.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors. The result is the estimated computing power in the Single-Precision FP32 mode