AMD FX-8370E
VS
AMD A6-3430MX
AMD FX-8370E
VS
AMD A6-3430MX

Which to select

It is time to pick the winner. What is the difference between AMD FX-8370E vs AMD A6-3430MX? What CPU is more powerful? It is quite easy to determine – look at comparison table. The processor with more cores/ threads and also with higher frequency is the absolute winner!

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Who will win between AMD FX-8370E vs  AMD A6-3430MX. The general performance of a CPU can easily be determined based on the number of its cores and the thread count, as well as the base frequency and Turbo frequency. The more GHz and cores a CPU has, the better. Please note that high technical specs require using a powerful cooling system.

3.30 GHz
Frequency
1.70 GHz
8
CPU Cores
4
4.30 GHz
Turbo (1 Core)
2.40 GHz
8
CPU Threads
4
No
Hyperthreading
No
Yes
Overclocking
Yes
Turbo (4 Cores)
2.40 GHz
3.80 GHz
Turbo (8 Cores)

CPU generation and family

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers complement their CPUs with graphic chips, such a solution being especially popular in laptops. The higher the clock frequency of a GPU is and the bigger its memory, the better. Find a winner - AMD FX-8370E vs AMD A6-3430MX. 

GPU name
AMD Radeon HD 6520G
GPU frequency
0.40 GHz
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
Generation
3
DirectX Version
11
Execution units
5
Shader
320
--
Max. Memory
1 GB
Max. displays
2
Technology
32 nm
Release date
Q2/2011

Hardware codec support

Here we deal with specs that are used by some CPU manufacturers. These numbers are mainly technical and can be neglected for the purpose of the comparison analysis.

No
h264
Decode
No
JPEG
Decode / Encode
No
h265 8bit
No
No
h265 10bit
No
No
VP8
No
No
VP9
No
No
VC-1
Decode
No
AVC
Decode

Memory & PCIe

These are memory standards supported by CPUs. The higher such standards, the better a CPU’s performance is.

DDR3-1866
Memory type
DDR3-1600
2
Memory channels
2
Yes
ECC
No

Encryption

Data encryption support

Yes
AES-NI
Yes

Memory & AMP; PCIe

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP), sometimes called thermal design point, is the maximum amount of heat generated by a computer chip or component (often a CPU, GPU or system on a chip) that the cooling system in a computer is designed to dissipate under any workload.

95 W
TDP
45 W
--
Tjunction max.
--
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--

Technical details

8.00 MB
L3-Cache
4.00 MB
32 nm
Technology
32 nm
Vishera
Architecture
Llano
AMD-V
Virtualization
AMD-V
AM3+
Socket
FS1
Q3/2014
Release date
Q4/2011
ca. 170 $
Market price

Devices using this processor

You probably know already what devices use CPUs. These can be a desktop or a laptop.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

This synthetic test will help you determine the real computing power of a single core in the central processing unit. Cinebench R11.5 is based on MAXON CINEMA 4D and employs various testing scenarios

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 carries out simultaneous cross-platform tests on all the processor’s cores. By running realistic 3D scenes, this benchmark will reveal all the potential of your Intel or AMD single-unit processor

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

The latter is used for creation of 3D models and forms. Cinebench R15 is used for single-core processor performance benchmark test. The hyperthreading ability doesn't count. It is the updated version of Cinebench 11.5. As all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite software

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 can be used for multi-core processor performance benchmark testing. The test produces precise and accurate results. This benchmark is the updated version of the Cinebench 11.5 which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is the benchmark for Intel and AMD 64-bit processors. It employs a new power estimation system for a single CPU core. This software carries out the modeling of real scenarios to provide accurate results

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 benchmark supports AMD and Intel multi-core processors. Being based on MAXON CINEMA 4D, it allows obtaining the real comparative CPU potential

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

It tests entire and overall performance of the central processing unit (mathematical calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphic tests). Please note that data can differ from the real-world situations.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors. The result is the estimated computing power in the Single-Precision FP32 mode