AMD Epyc 7702
VS
AMD Epyc 7702P
AMD Epyc 7702
VS
AMD Epyc 7702P

Which to select

It is time to pick the winner. What is the difference between AMD Epyc 7702 vs AMD Epyc 7702P? What CPU is more powerful? It is quite easy to determine – look at comparison table. The processor with more cores/ threads and also with higher frequency is the absolute winner!

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Who will win between AMD Epyc 7702 vs  AMD Epyc 7702P. The general performance of a CPU can easily be determined based on the number of its cores and the thread count, as well as the base frequency and Turbo frequency. The more GHz and cores a CPU has, the better. Please note that high technical specs require using a powerful cooling system.

2.00 GHz
Frequency
2.00 GHz
64
CPU Cores
64
3.35 GHz
Turbo (1 Core)
3.35 GHz
Yes
Hyperthreading
Yes
No
Overclocking
No
2.50 GHz
Turbo (64 Cores)
2.50 GHz

CPU generation and family

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers complement their CPUs with graphic chips, such a solution being especially popular in laptops. The higher the clock frequency of a GPU is and the bigger its memory, the better. Find a winner - AMD Epyc 7702 vs AMD Epyc 7702P. 

No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
--
Max. Memory
--

Hardware codec support

Here we deal with specs that are used by some CPU manufacturers. These numbers are mainly technical and can be neglected for the purpose of the comparison analysis.

No
h264
No
No
JPEG
No
No
h265 8bit
No
No
h265 10bit
No
No
VP8
No
No
VP9
No
No
VC-1
No
No
AVC
No

Memory & PCIe

These are memory standards supported by CPUs. The higher such standards, the better a CPU’s performance is.

DDR4-3200
Memory type
DDR4-3200
8
Memory channels
8
Yes
ECC
Yes
4.0
PCIe version
4.0
128
PCIe lanes
128

Encryption

Data encryption support

Yes
AES-NI
Yes

Memory & AMP; PCIe

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP), sometimes called thermal design point, is the maximum amount of heat generated by a computer chip or component (often a CPU, GPU or system on a chip) that the cooling system in a computer is designed to dissipate under any workload.

200 W
TDP
200 W
--
Tjunction max.
--
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--

Technical details

128
CPU Threads
128
256.00 MB
L3-Cache
256.00 MB
7 nm
Technology
7 nm
Rome (Zen 2)
Architecture
Rome (Zen 2)
AMD-V, SEV
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV
SP3
Socket
SP3
Q3/2019
Release date
Q3/2019
ca. 8000 $
Market price
ca. 7500 $

Devices using this processor

You probably know already what devices use CPUs. These can be a desktop or a laptop.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

Compatibility

Technologies and extensions

Virtualization technologies

Memory specs

Peripherals

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is based on Cinema 4 Suite. It is the software used to create 3D forms. The benchmark runs for single-core test procedure without counting of hyperthreading ability.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is the new version of the benchmark which is developed on the basis of Cinebench R15 (both versions are operated on the basis of Cinema 4 - the most popular 3D modeling software). Cinebench R20 is used for multi-core processor performance benchmark tests and hyperthreading ability.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the newest instalment of the most popular CPU Rendering Benchmark Multi-Core Cinebench. We have the Score Results for all modern Processors

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 benchmark is the newest software suit. Completely new algorithms provide the quite accurate benchmark testing results of the single-core CPU.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 software suite shows benchmark testing results of the memory performance and speed of the multi-core processor. Here the hyperthreading ability is counted.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

We use Blender benchmark to trace performance of the central processing unit. The testing results show you how fast the unit runs on the implementation of the multi-processing tasks

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

It tests entire and overall performance of the central processing unit (mathematical calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphic tests). Please note that data can differ from the real-world situations.

Monero Hashrate kH/s

Using a Graphics Card (GPU) is the ideal way to mine Monero. While it requires substantially more investment compared to using a CPU, its hash rate is significantly higher

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD Epyc 7702 AMD Epyc 7702P AMD Epyc 7702 vs. AMD Epyc 7702P