Radeon E9260 MXM
VS
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Radeon E9260 MXM
VS
NVIDIA Quadro T1000

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定Radeon E9260 MXM和NVIDIA Quadro T1000之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

not rated
业绩排名中的位置
211
GCN 4.0
建筑学
Turing
没有数据
代码名称
TU117
没有数据
类型
Workstation
27 September 2016 (5 years ago)
发布日期
27 May 2019 (2 years ago)
没有数据
当前价格
$2063
没有数据
物有所值
6.40
Baffin
图形处理器的代码名称
TU117
Desktop
市场部分
Workstation

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,Radeon E9260 MXM 与 NVIDIA Quadro T1000 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

1090 MHz
核心时钟频率
1395 MHz
没有数据
加速
1455 MHz
没有数据
晶体管的数量
4,700 million
14 nm
技术过程
12 nm
没有数据
消耗功率
50 Watt
57.60
每秒处理的文本数
没有数据
2,150 gflops
浮点运算
没有数据
896
转换器/CUDA核心
没有数据
1200 MHz
加速速度
1455 MHz
3,000 million
晶体管的数量
4,700 million
50 Watt
设计热量输出
50 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡Radeon E9260 MXM}和NVIDIA Quadro T1000}}}}}}的图形卡Radeon E9260 MXM}。

MXM-A (3.0)
介面
PCIe 3.0 x16
None
补充喂养
None

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. Radeon E9260 MXM 和NVIDIA Quadro T1000 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

GDDR5
存储器类型
没有数据
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
没有数据
128 Bit
存储器总线容量
没有数据
7000 MHz
存储器频率
8000 MHz
112.0 GB/s
内存带宽
没有数据

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡Radeon E9260 MXM和NVIDIA Quadro T1000的图形卡Radeon E9260 MXM。

No outputs
与显示器的连接
No outputs

API 支持

两个对手 Radeon E9260 MXM 和 NVIDIA Quadro T1000 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12.0 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2.131
Vulkan
没有数据
6.4
Shader Model
没有数据
2.0
OpenCL
没有数据

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 Radeon E9260 MXM 和 NVIDIA Quadro T1000 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 Radeon E9260 MXM 查明是否 NVIDIA Quadro T1000 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Radeon E9260 MXM
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Death Stranding (2020) Radeon E9260 MXM
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
F1 2020 (2020) Radeon E9260 MXM
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Gears Tactics (2020) Radeon E9260 MXM
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Doom Eternal (2020) Radeon E9260 MXM
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 Radeon E9260 MXM

There is no accountable advantage

优势 NVIDIA Quadro T1000

30.78% 在测试中更快

大的内存带宽 (12 nm vs 14 nm)

So, Radeon E9260 MXM or NVIDIA Quadro T1000?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA Quadro T1000 .

Radeon E9260 MXM versus NVIDIA Quadro T1000 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
4.1 Out of 59 Hitesti Score