Qualcomm Adreno 685
VS
Mobility FireGL V5600
Qualcomm Adreno 685
VS
Mobility FireGL V5600

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定Qualcomm Adreno 685和Mobility FireGL V5600之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

687
业绩排名中的位置
not rated
没有数据
建筑学
TeraScale
6 December 2018 (3 years ago)
发布日期
14 May 2007 (14 years ago)
$1429
当前价格
没有数据
0.58
物有所值
没有数据
没有数据
图形处理器的代码名称
M76
Laptop
市场部分
Workstation

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,Qualcomm Adreno 685 与 Mobility FireGL V5600 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

没有数据
核心时钟频率
500 MHz
7 nm
技术过程
65 nm
没有数据
每秒处理的文本数
4.000
没有数据
浮点运算
120 gflops
没有数据
转换器/CUDA核心
120
没有数据
晶体管的数量
390 million

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡Qualcomm Adreno 685}和Mobility FireGL V5600}}}}}}的图形卡Qualcomm Adreno 685}。

没有数据
介面
PCIe 2.0 x16

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. Qualcomm Adreno 685 和Mobility FireGL V5600 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

没有数据
存储器类型
GDDR3
没有数据
Maximum RAM amount
256 MB
没有数据
存储器总线容量
128 Bit
没有数据
存储器频率
800 MHz
没有数据
内存带宽
12.8 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡Qualcomm Adreno 685和Mobility FireGL V5600的图形卡Qualcomm Adreno 685。

没有数据
与显示器的连接
No outputs

API 支持

两个对手 Qualcomm Adreno 685 和 Mobility FireGL V5600 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

DirectX 12
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
没有数据
OpenGL
3.3
没有数据
Vulkan
N/A
没有数据
Shader Model
4.0
没有数据
OpenCL
N/A

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 Qualcomm Adreno 685 和 Mobility FireGL V5600 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 Qualcomm Adreno 685 查明是否 Mobility FireGL V5600 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Mobility FireGL V5600
Death Stranding (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Mobility FireGL V5600
F1 2020 (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Mobility FireGL V5600
Gears Tactics (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Mobility FireGL V5600
Doom Eternal (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Mobility FireGL V5600
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 Qualcomm Adreno 685

4.32% 在测试中更快

大的内存带宽 (7 nm vs 65 nm)

优势 Mobility FireGL V5600

There is no accountable advantage

So, Qualcomm Adreno 685 or Mobility FireGL V5600?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 Qualcomm Adreno 685 .

Qualcomm Adreno 685 versus Mobility FireGL V5600 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

基准3DMark 11性能GPU。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看3DMark 11 Performance GPU的测试结果。

用户评价

3.3 Out of 12 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score