NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
VS
Xe DG1 OEM
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
VS
Xe DG1 OEM

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q和Xe DG1 OEM之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

212
业绩排名中的位置
not rated
Turing
建筑学
Generation 12.1
27 May 2019 (2 years ago)
发布日期
no data
N19P-Q1
图形处理器的代码名称
DG1
Mobile workstation
市场部分
Desktop

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q 与 Xe DG1 OEM 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

795 / 1230 MHz
核心时钟频率
没有数据
12 nm
技术过程
10 nm
75.60
每秒处理的文本数
62.00
768
转换器/CUDA核心
640
1455 MHz
加速速度
1550 MHz
4,700 million
晶体管的数量
没有数据
50 Watt
设计热量输出
30 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q}和Xe DG1 OEM}}}}}}的图形卡NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q}。

PCIe 3.0 x16
介面
PCIe 3.0 x4
没有数据
长度
178 mm
None
补充喂养
None
medium sized
Laptop size
没有数据

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q 和Xe DG1 OEM 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

GDDR5
存储器类型
LPDDR4X
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
128 Bit
存储器总线容量
128 Bit
8000 MHz
存储器频率
4.3 GB/s
80 GB/s
内存带宽
68.26 GB/s
-
共享内存
没有数据

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q和Xe DG1 OEM的图形卡NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q。

No outputs
与显示器的连接
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
没有数据
HDMI
+

API 支持

两个对手 NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q 和 Xe DG1 OEM 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

没有数据
DirectX
12 (12_1)
没有数据
OpenGL
4.6
没有数据
Vulkan
1.2
没有数据
Shader Model
6.4
没有数据
OpenCL
3.0

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q 和 Xe DG1 OEM 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q 查明是否 Xe DG1 OEM 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Xe DG1 OEM
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Xe DG1 OEM
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Xe DG1 OEM
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Xe DG1 OEM
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Xe DG1 OEM
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q

25.3% 在测试中更快

大的内存带宽 (80 GB/s vs 68.26 GB/s)

优势 Xe DG1 OEM

大的内存带宽 (10 nm vs 12 nm)

So, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q or Xe DG1 OEM?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q .

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q versus Xe DG1 OEM 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

3.9 Out of 9 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score