NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
VS
VIA Castle Rock
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
VS
VIA Castle Rock

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q和VIA Castle Rock之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

212
业绩排名中的位置
not rated
Turing
建筑学
没有数据
27 May 2019 (2 years ago)
发布日期
1 January 2003 (18 years ago)
没有数据
当前价格
$46
N19P-Q1
图形处理器的代码名称
CLE266
Mobile workstation
市场部分
Laptop

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q 与 VIA Castle Rock 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

795 / 1230 MHz
核心时钟频率
2 MHz
12 nm
技术过程
没有数据
75.60
每秒处理的文本数
没有数据
768
转换器/CUDA核心
3
1455 MHz
加速速度
没有数据
4,700 million
晶体管的数量
没有数据
50 Watt
设计热量输出
没有数据

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q}和VIA Castle Rock}}}}}}的图形卡NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q}。

PCIe 3.0 x16
介面
没有数据
None
补充喂养
没有数据
medium sized
Laptop size
没有数据

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q 和VIA Castle Rock 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

GDDR5
存储器类型
没有数据
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
没有数据
128 Bit
存储器总线容量
没有数据
8000 MHz
存储器频率
没有数据
80 GB/s
内存带宽
没有数据
-
共享内存
没有数据

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q和VIA Castle Rock的图形卡NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q。

No outputs
与显示器的连接
没有数据

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q 和 VIA Castle Rock 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q 查明是否 VIA Castle Rock 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
VIA Castle Rock
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
VIA Castle Rock
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
VIA Castle Rock
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
VIA Castle Rock
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
VIA Castle Rock
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q

25.3% 在测试中更快

优势 VIA Castle Rock

There is no accountable advantage

So, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q or VIA Castle Rock?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q .

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q versus VIA Castle Rock 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

3.9 Out of 9 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score