NVIDIA Quadro K2200
VS
NVIDIA T1000
NVIDIA Quadro K2200
VS
NVIDIA T1000

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定NVIDIA Quadro K2200和NVIDIA T1000之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

330
业绩排名中的位置
184
33.27
物有所值
没有数据
Maxwell
建筑学
Turing
GM107
代码名称
没有数据
Workstation
类型
没有数据
22 July 2014 (7 years ago)
发布日期
6 May 2021 (less than a year ago)
$395.75
初始价格
没有数据
$261 (0.7x MSRP)
当前价格
$13.21
7.66
物有所值
34.44
GM107
图形处理器的代码名称
TU117
Workstation
市场部分
Desktop

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,NVIDIA Quadro K2200 与 NVIDIA T1000 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

640
输送机
没有数据
1046 MHz
核心时钟频率
没有数据
1124 MHz
加速
没有数据
1,870 million
晶体管的数量
没有数据
28 nm
技术过程
12 nm
68 Watt
消耗功率
没有数据
44.96
每秒处理的文本数
78.12
1,439 gflops
浮点运算
没有数据
640
转换器/CUDA核心
896
1124 MHz
加速速度
1395 MHz
1,870 million
晶体管的数量
4,700 million
68 Watt
设计热量输出
50 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA Quadro K2200}和NVIDIA T1000}}}}}}的图形卡NVIDIA Quadro K2200}。

PCIe 2.0 x16
介面
PCIe 3.0 x16
202 mm
长度
没有数据
None
补充喂养
None

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. NVIDIA Quadro K2200 和NVIDIA T1000 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

GDDR5
存储器类型
GDDR6
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
128 Bit
存储器总线容量
128 Bit
5012 MHz
存储器频率
10 GB/s
80.19 GB/s
内存带宽
160.0 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA Quadro K2200和NVIDIA T1000的图形卡NVIDIA Quadro K2200。

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
与显示器的连接
4x mini-DisplayPort

API 支持

两个对手 NVIDIA Quadro K2200 和 NVIDIA T1000 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

12 (11_0)
DirectX
没有数据
4.6
OpenGL
没有数据
+
Vulkan
没有数据

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 NVIDIA Quadro K2200 和 NVIDIA T1000 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 NVIDIA Quadro K2200 查明是否 NVIDIA T1000 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2200
NVIDIA T1000
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2200
NVIDIA T1000
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2200
NVIDIA T1000
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2200
NVIDIA T1000
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2200
NVIDIA T1000
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 NVIDIA Quadro K2200

There is no accountable advantage

优势 NVIDIA T1000

11.87% 在测试中更快

更加便宜 ($13.21 vs $261 (0.7x MSRP))

大的内存带宽 (12 nm vs 28 nm)

大的内存带宽 (160.0 GB/s vs 80.19 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro K2200 or NVIDIA T1000?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA T1000 .

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 versus NVIDIA T1000 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看Octane Render OctaneBench的GPU测试结果。

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

7586 (100 %)

用户评价

4.4 Out of 27 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 8 Hitesti Score