NVIDIA NVS 310
VS
AMD FirePro 2270
NVIDIA NVS 310
VS
AMD FirePro 2270

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定NVIDIA NVS 310和AMD FirePro 2270之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

1002
业绩排名中的位置
1066
没有数据
物有所值
1.63
Fermi 2.0
建筑学
TeraScale 2
GF119
代码名称
Cedar
Workstation
类型
Workstation
26 June 2012 (9 years ago)
发布日期
31 January 2011 (10 years ago)
$159
初始价格
没有数据
$63 (0.4x MSRP)
当前价格
$100
0.03
物有所值
没有数据
GF119
图形处理器的代码名称
Cedar
Workstation
市场部分
Workstation

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,NVIDIA NVS 310 与 AMD FirePro 2270 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

48
输送机
80
523 MHz
核心时钟频率
600 MHz
292 million
晶体管的数量
292 million
40 nm
技术过程
40 nm
20 Watt
消耗功率
15 Watt
4.184
每秒处理的文本数
4.800
100.4 gflops
浮点运算
96 gflops
48
转换器/CUDA核心
80
292 million
晶体管的数量
292 million
20 Watt
设计热量输出
15 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA NVS 310}和AMD FirePro 2270}}}}}}的图形卡NVIDIA NVS 310}。

PCIe 2.0 x16
介面
PCIe 2.0 x16
156 mm
长度
170 mm
None
补充喂养
None

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. NVIDIA NVS 310 和AMD FirePro 2270 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

DDR3
存储器类型
GDDR3
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
64 Bit
存储器总线容量
64 Bit
1750 MHz
存储器频率
1200 MHz
14 GB/s
内存带宽
9.6 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA NVS 310和AMD FirePro 2270的图形卡NVIDIA NVS 310。

2x DisplayPort
与显示器的连接
1x DMS-59

API 支持

两个对手 NVIDIA NVS 310 和 AMD FirePro 2270 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 NVIDIA NVS 310 和 AMD FirePro 2270 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 NVIDIA NVS 310 查明是否 AMD FirePro 2270 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA NVS 310
AMD FirePro 2270
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA NVS 310
AMD FirePro 2270
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA NVS 310
AMD FirePro 2270
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA NVS 310
AMD FirePro 2270
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA NVS 310
AMD FirePro 2270
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 NVIDIA NVS 310

0.01% 在测试中更快

更加便宜 ($63 (0.4x MSRP) vs $100)

大的内存带宽 (14 GB/s vs 9.6 GB/s)

优势 AMD FirePro 2270

更多输送机 (80 vs 48)

更少的电力消耗 (15 Watt vs 20 Watt)

So, NVIDIA NVS 310 or AMD FirePro 2270?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA NVS 310 .

NVIDIA NVS 310 versus AMD FirePro 2270 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

4.2 Out of 6 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 2 Hitesti Score