NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
VS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
VS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448和AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

2439
业绩排名中的位置
not rated
0.04
物有所值
没有数据
Fermi 2.0
建筑学
GCN 5.0
GF110
代码名称
Vega 10
Desktop
类型
Desktop
29 November 2011
发布日期
7 August 2017 (4 years ago)
$289
初始价格
$699
$666
当前价格
$246 (0.4x MSRP)
没有数据
图形处理器的代码名称
Vega 10
没有数据
市场部分
Desktop

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 与 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

448
输送机
4096
732 MHz
核心时钟频率
1408 MHz
没有数据
加速
1668 MHz
3,000 million
晶体管的数量
12,500 million
40 nm
技术过程
14 nm
210 Watt
消耗功率
345 Watt
40.99
每秒处理的文本数
427.0
1,311.7 gflops
浮点运算
14,336 gflops
没有数据
转换器/CUDA核心
4096
没有数据
加速速度
1668 MHz
没有数据
晶体管的数量
12,500 million
没有数据
设计热量输出
345 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448}和AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling}}}}}}的图形卡NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448}。

PCIe 2.0 x16
介面
PCIe 3.0 x16
267 mm
长度
282 mm
2x 6-pin
补充喂养
2x 8-pin

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 和AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

GDDR5
存储器类型
HBM2
1280 MB
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
320 Bit
存储器总线容量
2048 Bit
3800 MHz
存储器频率
1890 MHz
152.0 GB/s
内存带宽
483.8 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448和AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling的图形卡NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448。

2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
与显示器的连接
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
没有数据
HDMI
+

API 支持

两个对手 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 和 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 和 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 查明是否 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

1.11% 在测试中更快

更少的电力消耗 (210 Watt vs 345 Watt)

最大的RAM尺寸 (1280 MB vs 8 GB)

优势 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

更加便宜 ($246 (0.4x MSRP) vs $666)

更多输送机 (4096 vs 448)

大的内存带宽 (14 nm vs 40 nm)

大的内存带宽 (483.8 GB/s vs 152.0 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 or AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 .

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling 基准测试中的比较

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

基准3DMark Fire Strike图形。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看3DMark Fire Strike Graphics的GPU测试结果。

用户评价

3.3 Out of 3 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score