Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
VS
G92
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
VS
G92

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)和G92之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

516
业绩排名中的位置
not rated
Gen. 12
建筑学
Tesla
11 May 2021 (less than a year ago)
发布日期
no data
没有数据
当前价格
$36
Tiger Lake Xe
图形处理器的代码名称
G92
Laptop
市场部分
Desktop

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 与 G92 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

350 MHz
核心时钟频率
没有数据
10 nm
技术过程
65 nm
32
转换器/CUDA核心
128
1450 MHz
加速速度
没有数据
没有数据
晶体管的数量
754 million

技术

让我们来看看有什么区别。值得注意的是,NVIDIA和AMD使用的是不同的技术。

没有数据
CUDA
1.1
+
Quick Sync
没有数据

API 支持

两个对手 Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 和 G92 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

没有数据
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
没有数据
OpenGL
3.3
没有数据
Vulkan
N/A
没有数据
Shader Model
4.0
没有数据
OpenCL
1.1

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 和 G92 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 查明是否 G92 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
G92
Death Stranding (2020) Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
G92
F1 2020 (2020) Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
G92
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
G92
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
G92
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

7.19% 在测试中更快

大的内存带宽 (10 nm vs 65 nm)

优势 G92

There is no accountable advantage

So, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) or G92?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) .

Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) versus G92 基准测试中的比较

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

基准3DMark Cloud Gate GPU。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看3DMark Cloud Gate GPU的测试结果。

0(0%)

3DMark Fire Strike Score

基准3DMark Fire Strike得分。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的3DMark Fire Strike Score测试结果。

0(0%)

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

基准3DMark Fire Strike图形。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看3DMark Fire Strike Graphics的GPU测试结果。

0(0%)

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

基准3DMark 11性能GPU。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看3DMark 11 Performance GPU的测试结果。

0(0%)

用户评价

4.5 Out of 2 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score