Apple M1 8-Core GPU
VS
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
VS
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定Apple M1 8-Core GPU和Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

62
业绩排名中的位置
not rated
没有数据
建筑学
Fahrenheit
10 November 2020 (1 year ago)
发布日期
22 March 1999 (22 years ago)
没有数据
图形处理器的代码名称
NV5 B5
Laptop
市场部分
Desktop

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,Apple M1 8-Core GPU 与 Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

1278 MHz
核心时钟频率
100 MHz
5 nm
技术过程
250 nm
没有数据
每秒处理的文本数
0.2
8
转换器/CUDA核心
没有数据
没有数据
晶体管的数量
15 million

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡Apple M1 8-Core GPU}和Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta}}}}}}的图形卡Apple M1 8-Core GPU}。

没有数据
介面
AGP 4x
没有数据
补充喂养
None

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. Apple M1 8-Core GPU 和Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

没有数据
存储器类型
SDR
没有数据
Maximum RAM amount
16 MB
没有数据
存储器总线容量
64 Bit
没有数据
存储器频率
133 MHz
没有数据
内存带宽
1.064 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡Apple M1 8-Core GPU和Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta的图形卡Apple M1 8-Core GPU。

没有数据
与显示器的连接
1x VGA

API 支持

两个对手 Apple M1 8-Core GPU 和 Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

没有数据
DirectX
6.0
没有数据
OpenGL
1.2
没有数据
Vulkan
N/A
没有数据
OpenCL
N/A

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 Apple M1 8-Core GPU 和 Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 Apple M1 8-Core GPU 查明是否 Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Apple M1 8-Core GPU
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta
Death Stranding (2020) Apple M1 8-Core GPU
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta
F1 2020 (2020) Apple M1 8-Core GPU
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta
Gears Tactics (2020) Apple M1 8-Core GPU
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta
Doom Eternal (2020) Apple M1 8-Core GPU
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 Apple M1 8-Core GPU

55.77% 在测试中更快

大的内存带宽 (5 nm vs 250 nm)

优势 Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta

There is no accountable advantage

So, Apple M1 8-Core GPU or Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 Apple M1 8-Core GPU .

Apple M1 8-Core GPU versus Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

基准3DMark冰风暴GPU。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看3DMark Ice Storm GPU的测试结果。

用户评价

4.0 Out of 371 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 3 Hitesti Score