AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
VS
VIA S3 Graphics ProSavage8
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
VS
VIA S3 Graphics ProSavage8

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)和VIA S3 Graphics ProSavage8之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

273
业绩排名中的位置
not rated
Vega
建筑学
没有数据
7 January 2020 (1 year ago)
发布日期
1 January 2001 (20 years ago)
$631
当前价格
没有数据
8.76
物有所值
没有数据
Vega Raven Ridge
图形处理器的代码名称
没有数据
Laptop
市场部分
Laptop

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000) 与 VIA S3 Graphics ProSavage8 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

7 nm
技术过程
没有数据
512
转换器/CUDA核心
没有数据
1750 MHz
加速速度
121 MHz

API 支持

两个对手 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000) 和 VIA S3 Graphics ProSavage8 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

DirectX 12_1
DirectX
没有数据

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000) 和 VIA S3 Graphics ProSavage8 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000) 查明是否 VIA S3 Graphics ProSavage8 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
VIA S3 Graphics ProSavage8
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
VIA S3 Graphics ProSavage8
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
VIA S3 Graphics ProSavage8
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
VIA S3 Graphics ProSavage8
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
VIA S3 Graphics ProSavage8
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)

17.77% 在测试中更快

优势 VIA S3 Graphics ProSavage8

There is no accountable advantage

So, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000) or VIA S3 Graphics ProSavage8?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000) .

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000) versus VIA S3 Graphics ProSavage8 基准测试中的比较

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

基准3DMark冰风暴GPU。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看3DMark Ice Storm GPU的测试结果。

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

基准3DMark Cloud Gate GPU。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看3DMark Cloud Gate GPU的测试结果。

3DMark Fire Strike Score

基准3DMark Fire Strike得分。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的3DMark Fire Strike Score测试结果。

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

基准3DMark Fire Strike图形。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看3DMark Fire Strike Graphics的GPU测试结果。

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

基准3DMark 11性能GPU。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看3DMark 11 Performance GPU的测试结果。

3DMark Vantage Performance

基准3DMark Vantage性能。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的3DMark Vantage性能测试结果。

用户评价

4.2 Out of 90 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score