AMD Cypress
VS
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
AMD Cypress
VS
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定AMD Cypress和NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

not rated
业绩排名中的位置
995
TeraScale 2
建筑学
Curie
Cypress
代码名称
G71
Desktop
类型
Workstation
no data
发布日期
21 August 2006 (15 years ago)
$12.72
当前价格
$105
没有数据
物有所值
0.03
Cypress
图形处理器的代码名称
G71
Desktop
市场部分
Workstation

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,AMD Cypress 与 NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

1600
输送机
没有数据
没有数据
核心时钟频率
450 MHz
2,154 million
晶体管的数量
278 million
40 nm
技术过程
90 nm
没有数据
消耗功率
35 Watt
没有数据
每秒处理的文本数
10.80
1600
转换器/CUDA核心
没有数据
2,154 million
晶体管的数量
278 million
没有数据
设计热量输出
35 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡AMD Cypress}和NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M}}}}}}的图形卡AMD Cypress}。

没有数据
介面
PCIe 1.0 x16

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. AMD Cypress 和NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

没有数据
存储器类型
GDDR3
没有数据
Maximum RAM amount
256 MB
没有数据
存储器总线容量
128 Bit
没有数据
存储器频率
1200 MHz
没有数据
内存带宽
19.2 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡AMD Cypress和NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M的图形卡AMD Cypress。

没有数据
与显示器的连接
No outputs

API 支持

两个对手 AMD Cypress 和 NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.1

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 AMD Cypress 和 NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 AMD Cypress 查明是否 NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 AMD Cypress

更加便宜 ($12.72 vs $105)

大的内存带宽 (40 nm vs 90 nm)

优势 NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M

1.14% 在测试中更快

So, AMD Cypress or NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M .

AMD Cypress versus NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score