AMD Cypress
VS
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
AMD Cypress
VS
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定AMD Cypress和NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

not rated
业绩排名中的位置
not rated
没有数据
物有所值
0.33
TeraScale 2
建筑学
Tesla
Cypress
代码名称
G98
Desktop
类型
Workstation
no data
发布日期
20 January 2009 (12 years ago)
没有数据
初始价格
$131.43
$12.72
当前价格
$201 (1.5x MSRP)
Cypress
图形处理器的代码名称
G98
Desktop
市场部分
Workstation

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,AMD Cypress 与 NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

1600
输送机
8
没有数据
核心时钟频率
550 MHz
2,154 million
晶体管的数量
210 million
40 nm
技术过程
65 nm
没有数据
消耗功率
40 Watt
没有数据
每秒处理的文本数
4.400
没有数据
浮点运算
2x 22.4 gflops
1600
转换器/CUDA核心
8
2,154 million
晶体管的数量
210 million
没有数据
设计热量输出
40 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡AMD Cypress}和NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420}}}}}}的图形卡AMD Cypress}。

没有数据
介面
PCIe 1.0 x16
没有数据
补充喂养
None

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. AMD Cypress 和NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

没有数据
存储器类型
GDDR3
没有数据
Maximum RAM amount
256 MB
没有数据
存储器总线容量
64 Bit
没有数据
存储器频率
1400 MHz
没有数据
内存带宽
11.2 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡AMD Cypress和NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420的图形卡AMD Cypress。

没有数据
与显示器的连接
No outputs

API 支持

两个对手 AMD Cypress 和 NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 AMD Cypress 和 NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 AMD Cypress 查明是否 NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 AMD Cypress

更加便宜 ($12.72 vs $201 (1.5x MSRP))

更多输送机 (1600 vs 8)

大的内存带宽 (40 nm vs 65 nm)

优势 NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420

0.42% 在测试中更快

So, AMD Cypress or NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 .

AMD Cypress versus NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score