一般信息
显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据，以确定AMD Cedar和NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB之间的胜负。请注意，比较是全面的，下面是来自合成基准的排名，定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。
技术数据
在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面，AMD Cedar 与 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB 相比，哪个显卡更好，是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
内存（频率和超频）
显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高（GDDR）越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. AMD Cedar 和NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:
API 支持
两个对手 AMD Cedar 和 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持（API）对整体性能影响不大，它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。
游戏中的表现
选择列表以识别 AMD Cedar 和 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率（从低到4K）用于测试。 找出是 AMD Cedar 查明是否 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB 适合游戏的
|
low
1280x720 |
med.
1920x1080 |
high
1920x1080 |
ultra
1920x1080 |
QHD
2560x1440 |
4K
3840x2160 |
||
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | AMD Cedar | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB | |||||||
| Death Stranding (2020) | AMD Cedar | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB | |||||||
| F1 2020 (2020) | AMD Cedar | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB | |||||||
| Gears Tactics (2020) | AMD Cedar | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB | |||||||
| Doom Eternal (2020) | AMD Cedar | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB | |||||||
| Legend | |
| 5 | Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps |
| May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected. | |
| 30 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps |
| 40 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps |
| 60 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps |
| May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected. | |
| ? | Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene. |
| Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family. | |
| The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results. | |
优势 AMD Cedar
更加便宜 ($17.81 vs $125)
优势 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB
12.28% 在测试中更快
更多输送机 (336 vs 80)
So, AMD Cedar or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB?
根据合成和游戏测试的结果，我们建议 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB .
AMD Cedar versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB 基准测试中的比较
基准3DMark冰风暴GPU。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看3DMark Ice Storm GPU的测试结果。
基准3DMark Cloud Gate GPU。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看3DMark Cloud Gate GPU的测试结果。
基准3DMark Fire Strike得分。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的3DMark Fire Strike Score测试结果。
基准3DMark Fire Strike图形。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看3DMark Fire Strike Graphics的GPU测试结果。
基准3DMark 11性能GPU。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看3DMark 11 Performance GPU的测试结果。
基准3DMark Vantage性能。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的3DMark Vantage性能测试结果。
用户评价
