AMD Cedar
VS
AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins)
AMD Cedar
VS
AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins)

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定AMD Cedar和AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins)之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

not rated
业绩排名中的位置
840
TeraScale 2
建筑学
GCN 1.1
Cedar
代码名称
Mullins
Desktop
类型
Laptop
no data
发布日期
29 April 2014 (7 years ago)
$17.81
当前价格
没有数据
Cedar
图形处理器的代码名称
Mullins
Desktop
市场部分
Laptop

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,AMD Cedar 与 AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins) 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

80
输送机
128
没有数据
核心时钟频率
500 MHz
292 million
晶体管的数量
没有数据
40 nm
技术过程
28 nm
80
转换器/CUDA核心
128
292 million
晶体管的数量
没有数据

API 支持

两个对手 AMD Cedar 和 AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins) 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.0
4.4
OpenGL
没有数据

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 AMD Cedar 和 AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins) 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 AMD Cedar 查明是否 AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins) 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins)
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins)
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins)
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins)
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins)
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 AMD Cedar

There is no accountable advantage

优势 AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins)

2.01% 在测试中更快

更多输送机 (128 vs 80)

大的内存带宽 (28 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Cedar or AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins)?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins) .

AMD Cedar versus AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins) 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

基准3DMark冰风暴GPU。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看3DMark Ice Storm GPU的测试结果。

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

基准3DMark Cloud Gate GPU。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看3DMark Cloud Gate GPU的测试结果。

3DMark Fire Strike Score

基准3DMark Fire Strike得分。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的3DMark Fire Strike Score测试结果。

用户评价

5.0 Out of 2 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score