AMD Cayman
VS
ATI Mobility Radeon 9550
AMD Cayman
VS
ATI Mobility Radeon 9550

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定AMD Cayman和ATI Mobility Radeon 9550之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

not rated
业绩排名中的位置
1346
没有数据
物有所值
0.12
TeraScale 3
建筑学
Rage 9
Cayman
代码名称
M12
Desktop
类型
Laptop
no data
发布日期
1 June 2004
$17.44
当前价格
$218
Cayman
图形处理器的代码名称
没有数据
Desktop
市场部分
没有数据

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,AMD Cayman 与 ATI Mobility Radeon 9550 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

1536
输送机
6
没有数据
核心时钟频率
250 MHz
没有数据
加速
210 MHz
2,640 million
晶体管的数量
76 million
40 nm
技术过程
130 nm
没有数据
每秒处理的文本数
1.000
1536
转换器/CUDA核心
没有数据
2,640 million
晶体管的数量
没有数据

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡AMD Cayman}和ATI Mobility Radeon 9550}}}}}}的图形卡AMD Cayman}。

没有数据
介面
AGP 4x
没有数据
Laptop size
medium sized

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. AMD Cayman 和ATI Mobility Radeon 9550 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

没有数据
存储器类型
DDR
没有数据
Maximum RAM amount
64 MB
没有数据
存储器总线容量
64 Bit
没有数据
存储器频率
486 MHz
没有数据
内存带宽
3.888 GB/s
没有数据
共享内存
-

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡AMD Cayman和ATI Mobility Radeon 9550的图形卡AMD Cayman。

没有数据
与显示器的连接
No outputs

API 支持

两个对手 AMD Cayman 和 ATI Mobility Radeon 9550 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0
4.4
OpenGL
2.0

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 AMD Cayman 和 ATI Mobility Radeon 9550 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 AMD Cayman 查明是否 ATI Mobility Radeon 9550 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cayman
ATI Mobility Radeon 9550
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cayman
ATI Mobility Radeon 9550
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cayman
ATI Mobility Radeon 9550
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cayman
ATI Mobility Radeon 9550
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cayman
ATI Mobility Radeon 9550
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 AMD Cayman

更加便宜 ($17.44 vs $218)

更多输送机 (1536 vs 6)

大的内存带宽 (40 nm vs 130 nm)

优势 ATI Mobility Radeon 9550

0.09% 在测试中更快

So, AMD Cayman or ATI Mobility Radeon 9550?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 ATI Mobility Radeon 9550 .

AMD Cayman versus ATI Mobility Radeon 9550 基准测试中的比较

用户评价

5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score