AMD Baffin
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
AMD Baffin
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定AMD Baffin和NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

not rated
业绩排名中的位置
48
物有所值
18.27
GCN 4.0
建筑学
Turing
Baffin
代码名称
TU104
Desktop
类型
Workstation
no data
发布日期
13 November 2018 (3 years ago)
初始价格
$899
$78
当前价格
$2480 (2.8x MSRP)
4.0
GCN一代
没有数据
没有数据
物有所值
12.88
Baffin
图形处理器的代码名称
TU104
Desktop
市场部分
Workstation

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,AMD Baffin 与 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

1024
输送机
2304
855 MHz
核心时钟频率
1005 MHz
1200 MHz
加速
1545 MHz
3,000 million
晶体管的数量
13,600 million
14 nm
技术过程
12 nm
80 W
消耗功率
160 Watt
每秒处理的文本数
222.5
1024
转换器/CUDA核心
2304
没有数据
加速速度
1545 MHz
3,000 million
晶体管的数量
13,600 million
没有数据
设计热量输出
160 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡AMD Baffin}和NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000}}}}}}的图形卡AMD Baffin}。

介面
PCIe 3.0 x16
长度
241 mm
补充喂养
1x 8-pin

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. AMD Baffin 和NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

存储器类型
GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
存储器总线容量
256 Bit
存储器频率
13000 MHz
内存带宽
416.0 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡AMD Baffin和NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000的图形卡AMD Baffin。

与显示器的连接
3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

技术

让我们来看看有什么区别。值得注意的是,NVIDIA和AMD使用的是不同的技术。

API 支持

两个对手 AMD Baffin 和 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 AMD Baffin 和 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 AMD Baffin 查明是否 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Baffin
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Baffin
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Baffin
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Baffin
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Baffin
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 AMD Baffin

更加便宜 ($78 vs $2480 (2.8x MSRP))

更少的电力消耗 (80 W vs 160 Watt)

支持G-SYNC

支持VR

多个显示器

优势 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

70.3% 在测试中更快

更多输送机 (2304 vs 1024)

大的内存带宽 (12 nm vs 14 nm)

So, AMD Baffin or NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 .

AMD Baffin versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

5.0 Out of 3 Hitesti Score
4.3 Out of 23 Hitesti Score