NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
VS
FirePro S9300 X2
NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
VS
FirePro S9300 X2

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI和FirePro S9300 X2之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

1813
业绩排名中的位置
not rated
0.08
物有所值
没有数据
Fermi
建筑学
GCN 3.0
GF100
代码名称
没有数据
Workstation
类型
没有数据
25 July 2011
发布日期
31 March 2016 (5 years ago)
$11,499
初始价格
$5,999
$340
当前价格
没有数据
没有数据
图形处理器的代码名称
Capsaicin
没有数据
市场部分
Workstation

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI 与 FirePro S9300 X2 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

448
输送机
没有数据
574 MHz
核心时钟频率
850 MHz
3,100 million
晶体管的数量
没有数据
40 nm
技术过程
28 nm
231 Watt
消耗功率
没有数据
32.14
每秒处理的文本数
217.6
1,027.7 gflops
浮点运算
2x 6,963 gflops
没有数据
转换器/CUDA核心
4096
没有数据
晶体管的数量
8,900 million
没有数据
设计热量输出
300 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI}和FirePro S9300 X2}}}}}}的图形卡NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI}。

PCIe 2.0 x16
介面
PCIe 3.0 x16
248 mm
长度
267 mm
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
补充喂养
2x 8-pin

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI 和FirePro S9300 X2 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

GDDR5
存储器类型
HBM
6 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
384 Bit
存储器总线容量
4096 Bit
2988 MHz
存储器频率
1000 MHz
143.4 GB/s
内存带宽
512.0 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI和FirePro S9300 X2的图形卡NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI。

2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video, 2x SDI
与显示器的连接
No outputs

API 支持

两个对手 NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI 和 FirePro S9300 X2 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
没有数据
Vulkan
1.2.131
没有数据
Shader Model
6.0
没有数据
OpenCL
2.0

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI 和 FirePro S9300 X2 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI 查明是否 FirePro S9300 X2 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
FirePro S9300 X2
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
FirePro S9300 X2
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
FirePro S9300 X2
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
FirePro S9300 X2
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
FirePro S9300 X2
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI

1.11% 在测试中更快

最大的RAM尺寸 (6 GB vs 4 GB)

优势 FirePro S9300 X2

大的内存带宽 (28 nm vs 40 nm)

大的内存带宽 (512.0 GB/s vs 143.4 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI or FirePro S9300 X2?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI .

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI versus FirePro S9300 X2 基准测试中的比较

用户评价

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
3.0 Out of 2 Hitesti Score