Tesla K20m
VS
NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Tesla K20m
VS
NVIDIA Quadro 6000

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Tesla K20m  vs  NVIDIA Quadro 6000.

not rated
Place in performance rating
405
no data
Value for money (0-100)
0.78
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
no data
Code name
GF100
no data
Type
Workstation
5 January 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
10 December 2010 (10 years ago)
$3,199
Launch price (MSRP)
$4,399
$5781 (1.8x MSRP)
Price now
$2259 (0.5x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
0.36
GK110
GPU code name
GF100
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Tesla K20m  vs  NVIDIA Quadro 6000 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
448
706 MHz
Core clock speed
574 MHz
no data
Transistor count
3,100 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
204 Watt
146.8
Texture fill rate
32.14
3,524 gflops
Floating-point performance
1,027.7 gflops
2496
Pipelines / CUDA cores
448
7,080 million
Number of transistors
3,100 million
225 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
204 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Tesla K20m and NVIDIA Quadro 6000 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
267 mm
Length
248 mm
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Tesla K20m vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
5 GB
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
320 Bit
Memory bus width
384 Bit
5200 MHz
Memory clock speed
2988 MHz
208.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
143.4 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Tesla K20m vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

3.5
CUDA
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Tesla K20m and NVIDIA Quadro 6000 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1.126
Vulkan
no data
5.1
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Tesla K20m and NVIDIA Quadro 6000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Tesla K20m or NVIDIA Quadro 6000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Tesla K20m
NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Death Stranding (2020) Tesla K20m
NVIDIA Quadro 6000
F1 2020 (2020) Tesla K20m
NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Gears Tactics (2020) Tesla K20m
NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Doom Eternal (2020) Tesla K20m
NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Tesla K20m

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

More memory bandwidth (208.0 GB/s vs 143.4 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro 6000

14.01% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($2259 (0.5x MSRP) vs $5781 (1.8x MSRP))

More maximum RAM amount (6 GB vs 5 GB)

So, Tesla K20m or NVIDIA Quadro 6000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro 6000 .

Tesla K20m versus NVIDIA Quadro 6000 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 9 Hitesti Score