STG-2000
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
STG-2000
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between STG-2000  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M.

not rated
Place in performance rating
828
no data
Architecture
Fermi
no data
Code name
GF116
no data
Type
Laptop
30 September 1995 (26 years ago)
Release date
6 December 2011 (10 years ago)
$249
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
no data
Price now
$55
no data
Value for money
0.26
NV1
GPU code name
N13E-GE2
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between STG-2000  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
144
75 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
no data
Boost Clock
753 MHz
no data
Transistor count
1,170 million
500 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
0.08
Texture fill rate
no data
no data
Floating-point performance
253.4 gflops
no data
CUDA cores
Up to 144
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
144
no data
Boost clock speed
753 MHz
1 million
Number of transistors
1,170 million
2 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
35 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards STG-2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCI
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
168 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data
no data
Laptop size
large
no data
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between STG-2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M.

FPM
Memory type
DDR3
1 MB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
50 MHz
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
400.0 MB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between STG-2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M.

1x VGA, 1x DB13W3
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
HDCP
+
no data
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
no data
HDMI
+

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
3D Vision
+
no data
CUDA
+
no data
Optimus
+
no data
3D Blu-Ray
+
no data
DirectX 11
DirectX 11
no data
DirectCompute
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders STG-2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

1.0
DirectX
12 API
N/A
OpenGL
4.5
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
5.1
N/A
OpenCL
1.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for STG-2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the STG-2000 or NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) STG-2000
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Death Stranding (2020) STG-2000
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
F1 2020 (2020) STG-2000
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Gears Tactics (2020) STG-2000
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Doom Eternal (2020) STG-2000
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of STG-2000

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

3.63% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 500 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (2 GB vs 1 MB)

So, STG-2000 or NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M .

STG-2000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.0 Out of 4 Hitesti Score
3.5 Out of 107 Hitesti Score