Radeon X1650 XT Dual
VS
NVIDIA Quadro P620
Radeon X1650 XT Dual
VS
NVIDIA Quadro P620

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Radeon X1650 XT Dual  vs  NVIDIA Quadro P620.

not rated
Place in performance rating
323
no data
Value for money (0-100)
22.11
R500
Architecture
Pascal
no data
Code name
GP107
no data
Type
Mobile workstation
30 October 2006 (15 years ago)
Release date
27 May 2019 (2 years ago)
no data
Price now
$170
no data
Value for money
36.28
RV560
GPU code name
GP107
Desktop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Radeon X1650 XT Dual  vs  NVIDIA Quadro P620 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
512
525 MHz
Core clock speed
1177 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1354 MHz
no data
Transistor count
3,300 million
80 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
40 Watt
4.200
Texture fill rate
43.33
no data
Floating-point performance
1,490 gflops
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
512
no data
Boost clock speed
1442 MHz
330 million
Number of transistors
3,300 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
40 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Radeon X1650 XT Dual and NVIDIA Quadro P620 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
145 mm
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Radeon X1650 XT Dual vs NVIDIA Quadro P620.

GDDR3
Memory type
GDDR5
256 MB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1400 MHz
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
22.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
80.13 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Radeon X1650 XT Dual vs NVIDIA Quadro P620.

2x DVI
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
Multi Monitor
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Radeon X1650 XT Dual and NVIDIA Quadro P620 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
Vulkan
+
3.0
Shader Model
no data
N/A
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Radeon X1650 XT Dual and NVIDIA Quadro P620 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Radeon X1650 XT Dual or NVIDIA Quadro P620 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Radeon X1650 XT Dual
NVIDIA Quadro P620
Death Stranding (2020) Radeon X1650 XT Dual
NVIDIA Quadro P620
F1 2020 (2020) Radeon X1650 XT Dual
NVIDIA Quadro P620
Gears Tactics (2020) Radeon X1650 XT Dual
NVIDIA Quadro P620
Doom Eternal (2020) Radeon X1650 XT Dual
NVIDIA Quadro P620
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Radeon X1650 XT Dual

More maximum RAM amount (256 MB vs 2 GB)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P620

17.83% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 80 nm)

More memory bandwidth (80.13 GB/s vs 22.4 GB/s)

Multi Monitor

So, Radeon X1650 XT Dual or NVIDIA Quadro P620?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro P620 .

Radeon X1650 XT Dual versus NVIDIA Quadro P620 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Ice Storm GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

310112 (100 %)

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Maya: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Maya test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Creo: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Creo test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Catia: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Catia test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
4.2 Out of 58 Hitesti Score