Radeon 9250
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 210
Radeon 9250
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 210

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Radeon 9250  vs  NVIDIA GeForce 210.

not rated
Place in performance rating
not rated
no data
Value for money (0-100)
2.85
Rage 7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
no data
Code name
GT218
no data
Type
Desktop
1 March 2004 (17 years ago)
Release date
12 October 2009 (12 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$29.49
$145
Price now
$68 (2.3x MSRP)
RV280
GPU code name
GT218
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Radeon 9250  vs  NVIDIA GeForce 210 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
16
240 MHz
Core clock speed
589 MHz
no data
Transistor count
260 million
150 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
30.5 Watt
0.96
Texture fill rate
4.160
no data
Floating-point performance
39.36 gflops
no data
Maximum GPU temperature
105 °C
no data
CUDA cores
16
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
16
36 million
Number of transistors
260 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
30.5 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Radeon 9250 and NVIDIA GeForce 210 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

AGP 8x
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
6.60" (16.8 cm)
None
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
no data
Height
2.731" (6.9 cm)

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Radeon 9250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210.

DDR
Memory type
GDDR2
64 MB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
400 MHz
Memory clock speed
500 MHz
3.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
8.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Radeon 9250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210.

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
DVIVGADisplayPort
no data
Multi monitor support
+
no data
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
no data
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
no data
HDMI
+

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
CUDA
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Radeon 9250 and NVIDIA GeForce 210 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

8.1
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
1.4
OpenGL
3.1
N/A
Vulkan
no data
N/A
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Radeon 9250 and NVIDIA GeForce 210 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Radeon 9250 or NVIDIA GeForce 210 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Radeon 9250
NVIDIA GeForce 210
Death Stranding (2020) Radeon 9250
NVIDIA GeForce 210
F1 2020 (2020) Radeon 9250
NVIDIA GeForce 210
Gears Tactics (2020) Radeon 9250
NVIDIA GeForce 210
Doom Eternal (2020) Radeon 9250
NVIDIA GeForce 210
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Radeon 9250

0.55% faster in synthetic tests

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210

Cheaper ($68 (2.3x MSRP) vs $145)

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 150 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 64 MB)

More memory bandwidth (8.0 GB/s vs 3.2 GB/s)

So, Radeon 9250 or NVIDIA GeForce 210?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Radeon 9250 .

Radeon 9250 versus NVIDIA GeForce 210 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.2 Out of 14 Hitesti Score
3.2 Out of 151 Hitesti Score